On death row, prisoners experience some of the harshest conditions in the American prison system, which often take a severe psychological and physical toll. Despite these challenges, many death-sentenced prisoners completely transform in prison — they become remorseful, accept responsibility, and devote themselves to education, mentorship, faith, and advocacy. Their stories stand in stark contrast to the common narrative that people sentenced to death are beyond redemption.
John Hanson of Oklahoma was described by Bureau of Prisons personnel as a trusted and peaceful prisoner. Correctional counselor Roseva Cosenza praised Mr. Hanson for “never partak[ing] in violence” while housed at USP Pollock, one of the most violent federal correctional facilities in the United States. During his 26 years of imprisonment, correctional officers often sent younger prisoners to him for guidance on how to navigate prison life. According to Ms. Cosenza, “Hanson consistently works to train and mentor other [prisoners] who may have less knowledge on a particular job detail and adjustment issues pertaining to confinement.” She said that sometimes prison staff “even referred new staff members to Mr. Hanson if they had questions,” because he “was always a safe bet, and you could always count on him.” But his application for clemency was denied, and Mr. Hanson was executed on June 12, 2025.
Anthony “Ant” Boyd, Chairman of Project Hope to Abolish the Death Penalty
Anthony “Ant” Boyd of Alabama became a leader in the death penalty abolition movement within his prison community. As the director of “Project Hope to Abolish the Death Penalty,” he worked with other incarcerated men to raise awareness about capital punishment and execution methods. An avid writer, Mr. Boyd emphasized forgiveness and reflection. “The world would be a better place if we all started to look for things like forgiveness and understanding in those mirrors we know as our hearts,” he wrote. In the days before his execution on October 23, 2025, fellow incarcerated men honored him with a tribute poem, pledging to continue the work he had begun. “I know what change is, because [I] saw it in you,” they wrote.
Both Mr. Hanson and Mr. Boyd were executed despite powerful evidence of their rehabilitation. In other cases, executives have used their clemency power to recognize a death-sentenced prisoner’s growth. The Supreme Court has calledexecutive clemency the “‘fail safe’ in our criminal justice system.” In fifteen states, the governor alone holds the authority to reduce a sentence or grant a pardon, while in eleven others, independent boards either advise the governor or make clemency determinations themselves.
Unlike appeals, clemency is not bound by strict legal standards. It can be granted for legal irregularities, mitigating circumstances, excessive punishment, comparative culpability, lingering concerns about innocence, or evolving views of justice. But it can also account for something courts often cannot: growth, transformation, and redemption.
In Kentucky, Leif Halvorsen pursued higher education while on death row, earning two degrees. He dedicated himself to mentoring and raising money for at-risk youth. Prison officials credited him with restoring calm in the prison and selected him as the sole death-sentenced prisoner to speak on a youth awareness panel. On his last day in office in 2019, Governor Matt Bevin commuted Mr. Halvorsen’s sentence, citing his “unique and inspiring story of redemption.” Gov. Bevin said that “Leif has a powerful voice that needs to be heard by more people.”
My years in prison have been spent reclaiming my life from the ashes of its ruins.
After pleading guilty to murder during a drunken robbery, William Moore of Georgia underwent a profound spiritual transformation while incarcerated. He became a mentor and minister, writing letters to over a thousand people around the world and offering guidance to fellow prisoners. With only hours remaining before his scheduled execution in 1990, the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles granted him clemency after hearing pleas from the victim’s family, local clergy who had witnessed Mr. Moore’s growth, and high profile individuals like Jesse Jackson and Mother Teresa. He was later released on parole and has since dedicated his life to speaking about redemption and the death penalty, stating at 2008 talk at Georgetown Law that a key factor in rehabilitation is a prisoner’s ability to communicate with the outside world.
The clemency process, however, is inherently political. Because clemency is an executive decision, it is influenced by the priorities and perspectives of those in power. The Death Penalty Information Center has found that in the modern era, eight of eleven mass capital clemency grants occurred when the executive did not face reelection; the remaining three were all granted alongside legal or legislative decisions abolishing the death penalty in the state. Similarly, in states where the executive had the sole power to grant clemency, approximately 85% of individual capital clemency grants were issued when the executive was not facing reelection. One possible explanation is that executives may fear that granting clemency will become a distracting campaign issue or hurt them politically. Yet recent polling suggests strong public support for mercy.
After 37 years in prison, I was not the broken teenager that was sentenced to die at the hands of the state. My transformation may look dramatic, but it is in no way unique. Just as I was, there are now thousands of people sitting in cells…who have spent years growing, learning, and changing. […] There has to be room for mercy and justice to sit together.
Stories of redemption are separate from the harm caused by the underlying crimes, but they do challenge an assumption that is an essential justification of the death penalty itself: that people who are sentenced to death are incapable of change. Clemency exists precisely because the legal system recognizes its own limits. Courts adjudicate facts and constitutional claims. Executives, through clemency, may consider mercy, growth, remorse, and the full arc of a human life.
Lee Hedgepeth, Hope in the House of Death, Tread, Oct. 23, 2025; Callie Heller, A Case for Clemency for John Fitzgerald Hanson (2025); New Polling Shows Criminal Justice Reform is a Winning Issue for 2024 Election, FWD.us, Oct. 9, 2024; Robin M. Maher and Leah Roemer, Lethal Election: How the U.S. Electoral Process Increases the Arbitrariness of the Death Penalty, Death Penalty Information Center (2024); ACLU Report Finds Significant Strides in Clemency Trends in 2022, ACLU, Apr. 11, 2023; Renaldo Hudson, Thank You for My Freedom, Gov. Pritzker. It is Time to Do More., Illinois Prison Project (2021); Molly Greene and Sean McElwee, Poll: Use Clemency Power To Fight Mass Incarceration, The Appeal, Apr. 28, 2021; Staff, Before Leaving Office, Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin Commutes the Sentences of Two Death-Row Prisoners, Death Penalty Information Center, Dec. 12, 2019; David Barron, Application for Executive Clemency for Leif C. Halvorsen (2019); Danielle Padilla, After Surviving Death Row, Moore Speaks About Freedom, The Hoya, Nov. 21, 2008; Erwin James, ‘Dead man’ talking, The Guardian, Apr. 22, 2008; Ronald Smothers, A Day Short of Death, a Georgia Killer Is Given Life, The New York Times, Aug. 22, 1990.