On death row, pris­on­ers expe­ri­ence some of the harsh­est con­di­tions in the American prison sys­tem, which often take a severe psy­cho­log­i­cal and phys­i­cal toll. Despite these chal­lenges, many death-sen­tenced pris­on­ers com­plete­ly trans­form in prison — they become remorse­ful, accept respon­si­bil­i­ty, and devote them­selves to edu­ca­tion, men­tor­ship, faith, and advo­ca­cy. Their sto­ries stand in stark con­trast to the com­mon nar­ra­tive that peo­ple sen­tenced to death are beyond redemption. 

John Hanson of Oklahoma was described by Bureau of Prisons per­son­nel as a trust­ed and peace­ful pris­on­er. Correctional coun­selor Roseva Cosenza praised Mr. Hanson for nev­er partak[ing] in vio­lence” while housed at USP Pollock, one of the most vio­lent fed­er­al cor­rec­tion­al facil­i­ties in the United States. During his 26 years of impris­on­ment, cor­rec­tion­al offi­cers often sent younger pris­on­ers to him for guid­ance on how to nav­i­gate prison life. According to Ms. Cosenza, Hanson con­sis­tent­ly works to train and men­tor oth­er [pris­on­ers] who may have less knowl­edge on a par­tic­u­lar job detail and adjust­ment issues per­tain­ing to con­fine­ment.” She said that some­times prison staff even referred new staff mem­bers to Mr. Hanson if they had ques­tions,” because he was always a safe bet, and you could always count on him.” But his appli­ca­tion for clemen­cy was denied, and Mr. Hanson was exe­cut­ed on June 122025

A Black man with a beard, mustache, and short hair, wearing a white shirt and smiling

Anthony Ant” Boyd, Chairman of Project Hope to Abolish the Death Penalty

Anthony Ant” Boyd of Alabama became a leader in the death penal­ty abo­li­tion move­ment with­in his prison com­mu­ni­ty. As the direc­tor of Project Hope to Abolish the Death Penalty,” he worked with oth­er incar­cer­at­ed men to raise aware­ness about cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment and exe­cu­tion meth­ods. An avid writer, Mr. Boyd empha­sized for­give­ness and reflec­tion. The world would be a bet­ter place if we all start­ed to look for things like for­give­ness and under­stand­ing in those mir­rors we know as our hearts,” he wrote. In the days before his exe­cu­tion on October 23, 2025, fel­low incar­cer­at­ed men hon­ored him with a trib­ute poem, pledg­ing to con­tin­ue the work he had begun. I know what change is, because [I] saw it in you,” they wrote. 

Both Mr. Hanson and Mr. Boyd were exe­cut­ed despite pow­er­ful evi­dence of their reha­bil­i­ta­tion. In oth­er cas­es, exec­u­tives have used their clemen­cy pow­er to rec­og­nize a death-sen­tenced prisoner’s growth. The Supreme Court has calledex­ec­u­tive clemen­cy the “‘fail safe’ in our crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem.” In fif­teen states, the gov­er­nor alone holds the author­i­ty to reduce a sen­tence or grant a par­don, while in eleven oth­ers, inde­pen­dent boards either advise the gov­er­nor or make clemen­cy determinations themselves.

Unlike appeals, clemen­cy is not bound by strict legal stan­dards. It can be grant­ed for legal irreg­u­lar­i­ties, mit­i­gat­ing cir­cum­stances, exces­sive pun­ish­ment, com­par­a­tive cul­pa­bil­i­ty, lin­ger­ing con­cerns about inno­cence, or evolv­ing views of jus­tice. But it can also account for some­thing courts often can­not: growth, trans­for­ma­tion, and redemption.

In Kentucky, Leif Halvorsen pur­sued high­er edu­ca­tion while on death row, earn­ing two degrees. He ded­i­cat­ed him­self to men­tor­ing and rais­ing mon­ey for at-risk youth. Prison offi­cials cred­it­ed him with restor­ing calm in the prison and select­ed him as the sole death-sen­tenced pris­on­er to speak on a youth aware­ness pan­el. On his last day in office in 2019, Governor Matt Bevin com­mut­ed Mr. Halvorsen’s sen­tence, cit­ing his unique and inspir­ing sto­ry of redemp­tion.” Gov. Bevin said that Leif has a pow­er­ful voice that needs to be heard by more people.” 

My years in prison have been spent reclaim­ing my life from the ash­es of its ruins.

Leif Halvorsen

After plead­ing guilty to mur­der dur­ing a drunk­en rob­bery, William Moore of Georgia under­went a pro­found spir­i­tu­al trans­for­ma­tion while incar­cer­at­ed. He became a men­tor and min­is­ter, writ­ing let­ters to over a thou­sand peo­ple around the world and offer­ing guid­ance to fel­low pris­on­ers. With only hours remain­ing before his sched­uled exe­cu­tion in 1990, the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles grant­ed him clemen­cy after hear­ing pleas from the victim’s fam­i­ly, local cler­gy who had wit­nessed Mr. Moore’s growth, and high pro­file indi­vid­u­als like Jesse Jackson and Mother Teresa. He was lat­er released on parole and has since ded­i­cat­ed his life to speak­ing about redemp­tion and the death penal­ty, stat­ing at 2008 talk at Georgetown Law that a key fac­tor in reha­bil­i­ta­tion is a prisoner’s abil­i­ty to com­mu­ni­cate with the outside world. 

The clemen­cy process, how­ev­er, is inher­ent­ly polit­i­cal. Because clemen­cy is an exec­u­tive deci­sion, it is influ­enced by the pri­or­i­ties and per­spec­tives of those in pow­er. The Death Penalty Information Center has found that in the mod­ern era, eight of eleven mass cap­i­tal clemen­cy grants occurred when the exec­u­tive did not face reelec­tion; the remain­ing three were all grant­ed along­side legal or leg­isla­tive deci­sions abol­ish­ing the death penal­ty in the state. Similarly, in states where the exec­u­tive had the sole pow­er to grant clemen­cy, approx­i­mate­ly 85% of indi­vid­ual cap­i­tal clemen­cy grants were issued when the exec­u­tive was not fac­ing reelec­tion. One pos­si­ble expla­na­tion is that exec­u­tives may fear that grant­i­ng clemen­cy will become a dis­tract­ing cam­paign issue or hurt them polit­i­cal­ly. Yet recent polling sug­gests strong pub­lic sup­port for mercy.

After 37 years in prison, I was not the bro­ken teenag­er that was sen­tenced to die at the hands of the state. My trans­for­ma­tion may look dra­mat­ic, but it is in no way unique. Just as I was, there are now thou­sands of peo­ple sit­ting in cells…who have spent years grow­ing, learn­ing, and chang­ing. […] There has to be room for mer­cy and jus­tice to sit together.

Renaldo Hudson IL

Stories of redemp­tion are sep­a­rate from the harm caused by the under­ly­ing crimes, but they do chal­lenge an assump­tion that is an essen­tial jus­ti­fi­ca­tion of the death penal­ty itself: that peo­ple who are sen­tenced to death are inca­pable of change. Clemency exists pre­cise­ly because the legal sys­tem rec­og­nizes its own lim­its. Courts adju­di­cate facts and con­sti­tu­tion­al claims. Executives, through clemen­cy, may con­sid­er mer­cy, growth, remorse, and the full arc of a human life.

Citation Guide
Sources

Lee Hedgepeth, Hope in the House of Death, Tread, Oct. 23, 2025; Callie Heller, A Case for Clemency for John Fitzgerald Hanson (2025); New Polling Shows Criminal Justice Reform is a Winning Issue for 2024 Election, FWD​.us, Oct. 9, 2024; Robin M. Maher and Leah Roemer, Lethal Election: How the U.S. Electoral Process Increases the Arbitrariness of the Death Penalty, Death Penalty Information Center (2024); ACLU Report Finds Significant Strides in Clemency Trends in 2022, ACLU, Apr. 11, 2023; Renaldo Hudson, Thank You for My Freedom, Gov. Pritzker. It is Time to Do More., Illinois Prison Project (2021); Molly Greene and Sean McElwee, Poll: Use Clemency Power To Fight Mass Incarceration, The Appeal, Apr. 28, 2021; Staff, Before Leaving Office, Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin Commutes the Sentences of Two Death-Row Prisoners, Death Penalty Information Center, Dec. 12, 2019; David Barron, Application for Executive Clemency for Leif C. Halvorsen (2019); Danielle Padilla, After Surviving Death Row, Moore Speaks About Freedom, The Hoya, Nov. 21, 2008; Erwin James, Dead man’ talk­ing, The Guardian, Apr. 22, 2008; Ronald Smothers, A Day Short of Death, a Georgia Killer Is Given Life, The New York Times, Aug. 221990