Publications & Testimony

Items: 3221 — 3230


Apr 26, 2013

NEW VOICES: Conservative Judge Who Imposed Death Sentences Changes His Mind

As a Superior Court judge in Delaware, Norman Barron was referred to as the hang­ing judge” because of his will­ing­ness to impose death sen­tences. In a recent op-ed for Delaware Online, the now-retired judge expressed how his views on the death penal­ty have changed: I believe the appli­ca­tion of the death penal­ty is quirky and capri­cious… it is impos­si­ble to jus­ti­fy why some mur­der­ers receive the death penal­ty while oth­ers, whose…

Read More

Apr 25, 2013

LETHAL INJECTION: Arkansas Plans to Use Untested Drug in Executions

The Arkansas Department of Corrections recent­ly announced it will use a new drug, phe­no­bar­bi­tal, for lethal injec­tions. Phenobarbital is used to treat seizures but has nev­er been used for exe­cu­tions in the U.S. Some experts are con­cerned that using drugs that are untest­ed for this pur­pose could result in inhu­mane treat­ment. David Lubarsky, who chairs the anes­the­si­ol­o­gy depart­ment at the University of Miami’s med­ical school, said, People should not…

Read More

Apr 24, 2013

INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY: Federal Appeals Court Says Evidence of Mental Retardation Is Too Late

On April 22, a divid­ed U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied Warren Hills appeal to halt his exe­cu­tion based on new evi­dence of his intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty. The Court ruled that Hill’s claim of intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty (men­tal retar­da­tion) was pre­sent­ed in an ear­li­er peti­tion and can­not be pre­sent­ed again, despite the new evi­dence. The judges also held that, even if Hill’s claim is a new one, it only chal­lenges his eli­gi­bil­i­ty for the death penal­ty, not his…

Read More

Apr 23, 2013

Connecticut Supreme Court Considers Executions After Death Penalty Repeal

On April 23, the Connecticut Supreme Court will con­sid­er whether the 11 inmates who remained on the state’s row after the leg­is­la­ture vot­ed to repeal the death penal­ty in 2012 can still be exe­cut­ed. Mark Rademacher, an attor­ney for one of the inmates, argued that the legislature’s repeal of the death penal­ty demon­strat­ed the pun­ish­ment is no longer nec­es­sary and, hence, exe­cut­ing his client would be cru­el and unusu­al pun­ish­ment. Rademacher also assert­ed that the law’s…

Read More

Apr 22, 2013

EDITORIALS: Conservatives and Death Penalty”

A recent edi­to­r­i­al in the Lincoln (Neb.) Journal Star high­light­ed some of the con­ser­v­a­tive argu­ments oppos­ing the death penal­ty. Edward Crane (pic­tured), founder of the CATO Institute, a lib­er­tar­i­an think tank, said, My own view on cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment is that it is moral­ly jus­ti­fied but that the gov­ern­ment is often so inept and cor­rupt that inno­cent peo­ple might die as a result. Thus, I per­son­al­ly oppose cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment.” The edi­to­r­i­al also quoted…

Read More

Apr 19, 2013

NEW VOICES: Cost and Impact on Victims’ Families Among Concerns for Conservative Christians

A recent arti­cle in the Liberty Champion, a pub­li­ca­tion of Liberty University, dis­cussed the con­cerns some con­ser­v­a­tive Christians have about the death penal­ty. The arti­cle by stu­dent Whitney Rutherford focused on the finan­cial costs of the death penal­ty and its emo­tion­al toll on mur­der vic­tims’ fam­i­lies: Rather than pro­vid­ing vic­tims, their fam­i­lies, and the fam­i­ly of the accused an expe­di­ent result, these groups are dragged through the emo­tion­al upheaval of…

Read More

Apr 18, 2013

RECENT LEGISLATION: Texas Legislature Examining Problems of Innocence and Racial Bias

Two bills under con­sid­er­a­tion in Texas aim to address issues in the state’s death penal­ty. House Bill 2458 would allow defen­dants to appeal their death sen­tences if they can prove that race was a sig­nif­i­cant fac­tor in the deci­sion to seek or impose the death penal­ty. Statistical evi­dence of bias can be used to sup­port such a claim. Similar bills, referred to as the Racial Justice Act, have been con­sid­ered in oth­er states. Testimony in favor of the bill…

Read More

Apr 17, 2013

FEDERAL DEATH PENALTY: A Puerto Rican Jury Again Votes Against Death Penalty

On April 11, a jury in Puerto Rico reject­ed a death sen­tence for a defen­dant con­vict­ed of mur­der­ing an under­cov­er police­man. Instead, Lashaun Casey will be sen­tenced life in prison with­out parole. The defen­dant was eli­gi­ble for the death penal­ty because the case was tried under fed­er­al law rather than the law of Puerto Rico, which abol­ished the death penal­ty under the con­sti­tu­tion it enact­ed in 1952. The Commonwealth has not car­ried out an exe­cu­tion since 1927. Anti-death…

Read More

Apr 16, 2013

NEW VOICES: PBS Airing of The Central Park Five” Underscores Problem of Innocence

George F. Will, con­ser­v­a­tive com­men­ta­tor of the Washington Post, recent­ly drew a les­son about the death penal­ty from the doc­u­men­tary The Central Park Five, which airs on PBS on Tuesday, April 16. Will wrote, “[T]his recount­ing of a mul­ti­fac­eted but, for­tu­nate­ly, not fatal fail­ure of the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem but­tress­es the con­ser­v­a­tive case against the death penal­ty: Its final­i­ty leaves no room for rectifying mistakes.”…

Read More

Apr 15, 2013

DPIC’s Annual Appeal

Today, in lieu of our dai­ly What’s New,” we are mak­ing a spe­cial request. Please take a moment to con­sid­er the impor­tance of DPIC’s work on the death penal­ty and make a dona­tion to sup­port these efforts. Pulitzer-Prize win­ning jour­nal­ist Raymond Bonner called DPIC the best sin­gle source of facts, fig­ures, and oth­er infor­ma­tion about cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment in America.” DPIC reach­es almost 3 mil­lion vis­i­tors per year through its web­site and mil­lions more through our work with the…

Read More