Publications & Testimony

Testimony and Statements on the Death Penalty

FROM DPIC

For testimony by former Executive Director Robert Dunham and former Executive Director Richard C. Dieter, please visit our page DPIC Testimony.

FROM RELIGIOUS LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS

FROM THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY

FROM ADVOCACY GROUPS

FROM JUDGES, LEGISLATORS, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS

FROM MURDER VICTIMS’ FAMILY MEMBERS

Items: 3801 — 3810


May 29, 2012

NEW RESOURCES: DPIC’s Summary of First Ruling Under North Carolina’s Racial Justice Act

The Death Penalty Information Center has prepared a summary of North Carolina v. Robinson, the first ruling issued under North Carolina’s Racial Justice Act. The opinion by Superior Court Judge Gregory Weeks on April 22, 2012, reduced Marcus Robinson’s (pictured) death sentence to life without parole. DPIC’s summary highlights the statistical evidence of racial bias in eliminating potential black jurors that led the court to rule in Robinson’s favor. The Court concluded “that Robinson has…

Read More

May 25, 2012

LETHAL INJECTION: Missouri Intends to Use Propofol in One-Drug Lethal Injection

The Missouri Department of Corrections has announced that it is switching from a three-drug lethal injection protocol to a single-drug method, using Propofol. Missouri would be the first state to use Propofol (Diprivan) as an execution drug.The drug is manufactured by AstraZeneca. At least one medical expert has questioned whether the new execution drug is appropriate. Missouri’s written protocol does not require a physician to be a part of the execution team. Dr. Jonathan Groner, an Ohio State…

Read More

May 24, 2012

NEW RESOURCES-PODCAST: Former Death Row Inmate Freed in Alabama

In the latest edition of the Death Penalty Information Center’s podcasts, we interview attorney Jennifer Whitfield (pictured) of Covington & Burling, who worked to secure the release of former death row inmate Larry Smith in Alabama. Mr. Smith was sentenced to death in 1995 for a murder related to a robbery. His conviction hinged on a statement he made after 4 hours of interrogation. In violation of police guidelines, his interrogation was not recorded, and Mr. Smith later said his admission of…

Read More

May 23, 2012

BOOKS: “Killing McVeigh: The Death Penalty and the Myth of Closure”

A new book by Professor Jody Lynee’ Madeira of the Indiana University School of Law follows the aftermath of the Oklahoma City bombing to explore whether the families of murder victims obtain closure from an execution. In Killing McVeigh: The Death Penalty and the Myth of Closure, Prof. Madeira recounts her wide range of interviews with those who experienced this tragedy first-hand. Regarding the book, Professor Carol Steiker of Harvard said, “Everyone seems to have an opinion about whether the…

Read More

May 22, 2012

ARBITRARINESS: Widely Disparate Use of the Death Penalty in Ohio Raises Concerns

According to a review by the Associated Press, at least one county in Ohio appears to be using the death penalty as a way of obtaining plea bargains. For example, the chief Prosecutor of Cuyahoga County (Ohio), Bill Mason, originally announced his intent to seek the death penalty against six men who were indicted days after a drug-related slaying in suburban Cleveland. However, plea bargains were granted in all of the cases, and four of the men received probation and never even went to prison.

Read More

May 18, 2012

FOREIGN NATIONALS: The Importance of Intervention for Citizens of Other Countries Facing U.S. Death Penalty

A new video prepared with international support discusses the importance of foreign embassies lending support when citizens of their countries face the death penalty in the United States. According to Ambassador Joao Vale de Almedia, Head of the European Union Delegation to the U.S., “Foreign nationals are particularly vulnerable in death penalty cases. They’re most likely not to know the language perfectly, and certainly not know the way justice is administered in that particular country. So…

Read More

May 17, 2012

EDITORIALS: The Fallibility of Forensic Evidence Argues Against the Death Penalty

A recent editorial in the Lincoln Journal Star of Nebraska concluded that experience with inaccurate evidence from crime labs shows that the death penalty cannot be trusted in the taking of life. The paper called for the repeal of the death penalty based on a case in which the state’s CSI director tampered with evidence in a murder case. Recently, the Nebraska Supreme Court upheld the conviction of former CSI chief David Kofoed for planting evidence in a double murder. Kofoed placed a speck of…

Read More

May 16, 2012

NEW VOICES: Texas’s Baptist Standard Advocates Ending Death Penalty

An editorial in the Baptist Standard, published in Texas, recently called for repealing the death penalty in the next legislative session. Among the reasons cited by the paper for ending capital punishment were principles of religious faith, the risk of executing innocent defendants, its ineffectiveness in deterring crime, the high costs of prosecution, and its unfairness in affecting the poor and people of color. The editorial quoted the recent report from the National Research Council…

Read More

May 15, 2012

INNOCENCE: New Evidence That Texas May Have Executed an Innocent Man

In one of the most comprehensive investigations ever undertaken about the execution of a possibly innocent defendant, Professor James Liebman and other researchers at Columbia University Law School have published a groundbreaking report on the case of Carlos DeLuna (pictured), who was executed in Texas in 1989. This “Anatomy of a Wrongful Execution” is being published today (May 15) in Columbia’s Human Rights Law Review. Prof. Liebman concluded DeLuna was innocent and was wrongly convicted “on…

Read More

May 14, 2012

MENTAL ILLNESS: Texas Scheduled to Execute Forcibly-Medicated Inmate

UPDATE: Execution stayed by Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (May 14). Steven Staley (pictured) is scheduled to be executed in Texas on May 16, despite the likelihood that he would be deemed incompetent for execution if he was not being forcibly medicated under court order. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that it is unconstitutional to execute an inmate who is mentally incompetent. In a non-death penalty context, the Court has also held that it is permissilble to forcibly medicate an inmate if…

Read More