Publications & Testimony

Items: 3891 — 3900


Jun 24, 2010

EDITORIALS: Congress Must Rewrite the Law Governing Lawyers for Poor Death-Row Inmates”

The Washington Post recent­ly pub­lished an edi­to­r­i­al call­ing for Congress to rewrite the part of the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 that gov­erns legal rep­re­sen­ta­tion for indi­gent death-penal­ty defen­dants. The law allows a fast-track for fed­er­al appeals of state cap­i­tal con­vic­tions pro­vid­ed states guar­an­tee and pay for a sys­tem of legal rep­re­sen­ta­tion that cov­ers all cap­i­tal defen­dants . Originally, the pro­gram had to be cer­ti­fied by the federal…

Read More

Jun 23, 2010

NEW VOICES: Former New Hampshire Supreme Court Justice Calls for Abolition

Joseph P. Nadeau, who served on New Hampshires Supreme Court for six years and as a judge for 37 years, recent­ly tes­ti­fied before the state’s death penal­ty com­mis­sion about his oppo­si­tion to the prac­tice. In an op-ed, Judge Nadeau sum­ma­rized the moral and prac­ti­cal rea­sons why he believes cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment should be repealed. Our think­ing evolves, as peo­ple, tech­nol­o­gy, and soci­eties progress,” he said. And what is accept­able at one time in our history…

Read More

Jun 22, 2010

NEW RESOURCES: The State of the World’s Human Rights”

Amnesty International recent­ly released its annu­al report on inter­na­tion­al abus­es and progress in the field of human rights: The State of the World’s Human Rights.” The report cov­ers January to December 2009 and address­es human rights issues in every coun­try around the world. The report also high­lights coun­tries’ involve­ment in inter­na­tion­al and region­al human rights treaties. Among the nations in the Americas, the United States had the most active…

Read More

Jun 21, 2010

Federal Court Finds Georgia’s Standards for Mental Retardation (Intellectual Disability) Unconstitutional

On June 18, a fed­er­al appeals court in Atlanta held that the bur­den Georgia places on death-penal­ty defen­dants to prove they are intel­lec­tu­al­ly dis­abled, and thus exempt from the death penal­ty, is uncon­sti­tu­tion­al. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit said that requir­ing defen­dants to prove intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty (men­tal retar­da­tion) beyond a rea­son­able doubt” vio­lates the Eighth Amendment’s ban against cru­el and unusu­al pun­ish­ments. It could…

Read More

Jun 18, 2010

BOOKS: Voices of the Death Penalty Debate

Voices of the Death Penalty Debate: A Citizen’s Guide to Capital Punishment is a new book that explores argu­ments for and against the death penal­ty through tes­ti­mo­ny giv­en at the his­toric 2004 and 2005 hear­ings in New York on whether the state’s death penal­ty should be rein­stat­ed. The state’s law was struck down by the N.Y. Court of Appeals in 2004. Authored by Russell Murphy, a Suffolk University Law School pro­fes­sor, the book walks read­ers through tes­ti­mo­ny from…

Read More

Jun 17, 2010

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear California Death Penalty Case

On June 14, the U.S. Supreme Court grant­ed cer­tio­rari in Cullen v. Pinholster. In 1984, Scott Pinholster was con­vict­ed and sen­tenced to death for killing two men dur­ing a bur­glary in Los Angeles, California. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit over­turned Pinholster’s death sen­tence because of inef­fec­tive­ness of coun­sel since his lawyer did not give the jury evi­dence of Pinholster’s men­tal ill­ness dur­ing the penal­ty phase…

Read More

Jun 16, 2010

DNA Evidence Could Show If Texas Executed an Innocent Man

Texas Judge Paul C. Murphy recent­ly ordered pros­e­cu­tors to hand over key evi­dence from a 1989 mur­der case to the Innocence Project and the Texas Observer for DNA test­ing. In 2007, the Innocence Project and the Observer filed suit to obtain a one-inch strand of hair that alleged­ly impli­cat­ed Claude Howard Jones (pic­tured) in the killing of a liquor store own­er in San Jacinto County. Other than vague eye­wit­ness accounts and…

Read More

Jun 15, 2010

Supreme Court Allows Late Appeal Under Extraordinary Circumstances

On June 14, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Albert Holland, who lost his right to file a fed­er­al appeal of his death sen­tence when his lawyer missed the 1‑year dead­line estab­lished under the Anti-ter­ror­ism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA). The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled that Holland’s attor­ney’s con­duct in miss­ing the dead­line was not egre­gious enough to war­rant set­ting aside the imposed…

Read More

Jun 10, 2010

NEW VOICES: Utah Religious Leaders Express Concerns about the Death Penalty in Anticipation of Firing Squad Execution

The upcom­ing exe­cu­tion of Ronnie Lee Gardner, who has opt­ed to be killed by a fir­ing squad in Utah on June 18, has attract­ed the atten­tion of many peo­ple of faith in the state. Hours before Gardner’s exe­cu­tion, promi­nent reli­gious lead­ers will gath­er for a vig­il to protest the exe­cu­tion. Religious lead­ers from groups often asso­ci­at­ed with being sup­port­ive of the death penal­ty have recent­ly voiced con­cerns about the prac­tice. The Mormon Church…

Read More