Publications & Testimony

Testimony and Statements on the Death Penalty

FROM DPIC

For testimony by former Executive Director Robert Dunham and former Executive Director Richard C. Dieter, please visit our page DPIC Testimony.

FROM RELIGIOUS LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS

FROM THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY

FROM ADVOCACY GROUPS

FROM JUDGES, LEGISLATORS, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS

FROM MURDER VICTIMS’ FAMILY MEMBERS

Items: 4011 — 4020


Aug 11, 2011

NEW RESOURCES: Five New States Added to State Information Pages

DPIC is pleased to announce the addition of five more states to one of our latest resources, the State Information Pages. Adding to the original 15 state pages made available earlier, pages for Alaska, Kansas, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Wisconsin may now be accessed as well. These pages provide historical and current information on the death penalty for each state (regardless of whether it currently has the death penalty), including famous cases, past legislative actions, and important…

Read More

Aug 10, 2011

UPCOMING EXECUTION: Virginia Jurors Never Heard Critical Evidence of Childhood Abuse

Lawyers for Jerry Terrell Jackson, who is currently facing execution in Virginia on August 18, recently petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to spare Jackson’s life, arguing that the jury in his 2003 trial did not receive sufficient evidence of the abuse he suffered as a child because his trial lawyers were inadequate. Jackson’s current lawyers told the Court that this evidence could have convinced some jurors not to impose a death sentence: “This Court has repeatedly held that, before a defendant…

Read More

Aug 09, 2011

COSTS: In Indiana, the Death Penalty is Very Expensive with Little or No Return

Seeking the death penalty in Indiana is very expensive, even though most cases in which the death penalty is sought do not end in an execution. According to the Indiana Public Defender Council, only 16% percent of death penalty cases in the state filed between 1990 and 2009 (30 out of 188) ended with a death sentence, and even fewer resulted in an execution. In Vanderburgh County, where taxpayers have spent $800,000 in the last two decades defending capital cases, only one of the last five…

Read More

Aug 08, 2011

NEW RESOURCES: DPIC’s Latest Podcast Addresses the Supreme Court’s Role in the Death Penalty

The latest edition of the Death Penalty Information Center’s series of podcasts, DPIC on the Issues, is now available. This podcast addresses questions about the U.S. Supreme Court’s role in overseeing the constitutionality of the death penalty. The podcast discusses the kinds of cases the Court takes on review and briefly describes a few key Supreme Court decisions on the death penalty, including Furman v. Georgia and Gregg v. Georgia. The Supreme Court’s role in the recent limitations on…

Read More

Aug 06, 2011

Charges Dropped Against Sailor Convicted of Capital Murder and Rape

On August 4 in Virginia, Norfolk Circuit Court Judge Charles Poston accepted the state’s request to dismiss charges against Derek Tice, one of four men known collectively as the Norfolk Four (pictured; Tice is at the lower left), who were originally convicted of a rape and murder following a suspect series of confessions. All four were sentenced to prison. Appeals by attorneys for the Norfolk Four alleged that Robert Glenn Ford, the police detective in the case, obtained false confessions from…

Read More

Aug 05, 2011

NEW RESOURCES: DPIC’s Summary of 2011 California Cost Study

The Death Penalty Information Center has prepared a summary of a comprehensive cost study of California’s death penalty system recently published by federal Judge Arthur L. Alarcon and Loyola Law School Professor Paula M. Mitchell. The original study is entitled Executing the Will of the Voters?: A Roadmap to Mend or End the California Legislature’s Multi-Billion Dollar Death Penalty Debacle, and it was published in a special issue of the Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review. Using charts, graphs…

Read More

Aug 04, 2011

First Federal Death Sentence in Non-Death Penalty State Overturned

On August 3 the U.S. Court of the Appeals for the Sixth Circuit overturned the federal death sentence of Marvin Gabrion, who was convicted of a 1997 murder in a National Forest in Michigan. Gabrion was the first defendant in the country to receive the federal death penalty for a crime committed in a non-death penalty state since the federal death penalty was reinstated in 1988. All three members of the judicial panel upheld Gabriion’s murder conviction, but two judges called for another…

Read More

Aug 02, 2011

STUDIES: Amnesty International’s Report on the U.S. Death Penalty After 35 Years

A report released by Amnesty International in July looks at recent developments in the lethal injection controversy in the U.S. and provides an overview of the death penalty since it was reinstated in 1976 in Gregg v. Georgia. Amnesty’s report, entitled “An Embarrassment of Hitches: Reflections on the Death Penalty, 35 Years After Gregg v. Georgia, As States Scramble for Lethal Injection Drugs,” begins with a discussion of a lawsuit filed by attorneys for Arizona death row inmate Donald Beaty…

Read More

Aug 01, 2011

Texas Blocks Investigation into Execution of Possibly Innocent Man

On July 29, Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott ruled that the state’s Forensic Science Commission (FSC) does not have authority to review evidence regarding the possible innocence of Cameron Todd Willingham (pictured), who was executed in 2004. Willingham was convicted of setting the fire that killed his three children, but investigtions by prominent forensic scientists have discredited the evidence of arson presented at trial. Abbott said evidence that was tested or offered into evidence prior…

Read More

Aug 01, 2011

United States Supreme Court Decisions: 2010 – 2011 Term

Cert. granted and decided, May 2, 2011 (Per Curiam) The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed Harry Mitts’s death sentence in Ohio, holding that the jury instructions violated Beck v. Alabama (1980). On May 2, 2011, the Supreme Court reversed the Sixth Circuit, stating that this case was governed by Smith v. Spisak (2010) and that Beck did not apply to the penalty phase of a capital case. Since Spisak was also an Ohio case, the jury instructions here were virtually identical…

Read More