Publications & Testimony

Testimony and Statements on the Death Penalty

FROM DPIC

For testimony by former Executive Director Robert Dunham and former Executive Director Richard C. Dieter, please visit our page DPIC Testimony.

FROM RELIGIOUS LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS

FROM THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY

FROM ADVOCACY GROUPS

FROM JUDGES, LEGISLATORS, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS

FROM MURDER VICTIMS’ FAMILY MEMBERS

Items: 4091 — 4100


Apr 26, 2011

NEW RESOURCES: DPIC State Information Pages

DPIC is pleased to announce the launch of its latest resource, State Information Pages, providing historical and current information on the death penalty for each state. This resource is a work-in-progress, but we are happy to present the first 15 state pages. Our original state-by-state database is still the best place to look for frequently-updated information such as execution totals and murder rates. The new pages are designed as a source of information on each state’s unique history…

Read More

Apr 25, 2011

NEW VOICES: Law Enforcement Officials Say Death Penalty Does Not Make Them Safer

A recent article by Terrence P. Dwyer (pictured), retired New York State Police Investigator, and George F. Kain, a police commissioner in Ridgefield, Connecticut, dismissed the notion that the death penalty is needed to protect law enforcement officers. Dwyer and Kain wrote that a majority of police chiefs believe that the death penalty does not deter violent crime and rank the death penalty last in a list of effective tools for fighting crime. “In states like New York, which abolished its…

Read More

Apr 22, 2011

STUDIES: New Report Cites Multiple Problems with North Carolina’s Death Penalty

According to a comprehensive review of studies on the death penalty by Matthew Robinson, Professor of Government and Justice Studies at Appalachian State University, the death penalty in North Carolina is expensive, racially biased and ineffective. Prof. Robinson analyzed data from more than 20 death penalty studies and found them to be remarkably consistent in their conclusions. He said, “In the past six years, three states have abolished the death penalty: Illinois, New Mexico and New Jersey.

Read More

Apr 22, 2011

NEBRASKA EDITORIAL: Instead of a new means of capital punishment, the Legislature should get rid of it

Days after the Nebraska Supreme Court ruled that the electric chair was unconstitutional, a Lincoln Journal Star editorial urged the state to reconsider the death penalty: “Instead of rushing to pass a new means of capital punishment, the Legislature should take this opportunity to finally get rid of the death penalty.” Nebraska was the only state to retain the electric chair as its sole means of execution. The paper noted that it was the right time to take a broader look at the death penalty.

Read More

Apr 22, 2011

In New Mexico, Judge and Prosecutor Agree: No Funds Means No Death Penalty

In a potentially far reaching ruling, a trial judge in New Mexico has barred the state from seeking the death penalty because the legislature has failed to provide adequate funding for defense representation. The state’s Attorney General, Gary King, agreed that the capital prosecution cannot go forward. After finding that funding for the defense was insufficient and raised constitutional problems, King wrote, “The state now confesses the motion to dismiss filed herein and cannot in good faith…

Read More

Apr 22, 2011

New Mexico Trial Judge Finds State Death Penalty Unconstitutional

Ruling in a pre-trial matter in New Mexico, Judge Timothy Garcia of Santa Fe County’s First Judicial District Court held the state’s death penalty law to be unconstitutional based on a study by the Capital Jury Project. The Project’s research in 14 states had found that jurors often do not follow the law in making their sentencing decision. In particular, the judge found that the jurors’ propensity toward making their sentencing decision during the guilt-innocence phase of the trial was “an…

Read More

Apr 21, 2011

STUDIES: Texas Forensic Science Panel Calls for Changes but Says Nothing About Possible Wrongful Execution

On April 15, the Texas Forensic Science Commission recommended more education and training for fire investigators following its review of the controversial case of Cameron Todd Willingham (pictured), who was executed in 2004 for setting the fire that killed his three daughters. The Commission made 16 recommendations for investigators, lawyers and lawmakers. It did not, however, decide whether arson investigators in Willingham’s case were negligent or guilty of professional misconduct, and was…

Read More

Apr 21, 2011

NEW RESOURCE: “Legacy of Violence”

“Legacy of Violence: Lynch Mobs and Executions in Minnesota,” a book by John D. Bessler (University of Minnesota Press, 2003), examines the history of illegal and state-sanctioned executions in Minnesota, one of twelve states that currently does not have the death penalty. The book is timely in that the current governor, Tim Pawlenty, has proposed reinstating the death penalty, which was abolished in 1911. The book includes detailed personal accounts from those who were involved in the events…

Read More

Apr 21, 2011

NEW VOICES: Former Supporter Will Oppose Any Measure to Restore Minnesota Death Penalty

Minnesota Senator Tom Neuville, the leading Republican committee member on the state’s Senate Judiciary Committee, says he will oppose Governor Tim Pawlenty’s efforts to reinstate death penalty. Neuville’s basic opposition is moral: “If we solve violence by becoming violent ourselves, we become diminished.” Neuville, a former death penalty supporter whose reexamination of his pro-life beliefs led him to change his mind on the issue, feels that many of his colleagues share his concerns. “Life is…

Read More

Apr 21, 2011

Virginia Man Denied Consular Rights, Will Not Face Death Penalty

A Virginia judge ruled that prosecutors may not seek the death penalty against a Vietnamese man accused of murdering two people because police violated the man’s rights under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations by not informing him that he could contact his country’s consulate. “[T]he duty to give notice is absolute… . [T]he idea that the state can completely ignore its treaty obligations without consequence essentially obliterates the purpose for which the rights under the Vienna…

Read More