Publications & Testimony

According to a new study by the Associated Press, there has been a sharp drop in the use of the death penal­ty in Ohio as pros­e­cu­tors are tak­ing advan­tage of a new law allow­ing them to seek a sen­tence of life with­out parole with­out first pur­su­ing the death penal­ty. The sen­tence of life with­out parole used to be only an option for jurors weigh­ing an alter­na­tive to a death sen­tence. According to the AP, ​“Prosecutors around Ohio, cit­ing the abil­i­ty to pur­sue harsh punishment…

Ohio pros­e­cu­tors are tak­ing advan­tage of their new option of life with­out parole, seek­ing it much more often than the death penal­ty. The life sen­tence with­out the pos­si­bil­i­ty of parole used to only be an option for jurors weigh­ing an alter­na­tive to a death sen­tence. ​“Prosecutors around Ohio, cit­ing the abil­i­ty to pur­sue harsh pun­ish­ment with­out going through the com­pli­ca­tion and expense of a death penal­ty case are start­ing to take advan­tage of the 2005 law,” and the ​“num­ber of death penalty…

On June 25, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down as uncon­sti­tu­tion­al a Louisiana statute that allowed the death penal­ty for the rape of a child where the vic­tim did not die. In Kennedy v. Louisiana, the Court held that all such laws, where the crime against an indi­vid­ual involved no mur­der or intent to mur­der, were not in keep­ing with the nation­al con­sen­sus restrict­ing the death penal­ty to the worst offens­es. As a result, the only two peo­ple sen­tenced to death for this crime in the…

A for­mer Pennsylvania police chief was sen­tenced to life with­out parole on June 20, 2008, for the mur­der of his 31-year old ex-wife after the vic­tim’s fam­i­ly spoke against a death sen­tence at the penal­ty hear­ing. The dis­trict attor­ney had planned to seek the death penal­ty against Richard Curran, just as he had for every mur­der case in the last 13 years. However, Bonnie Smith, the victim’s moth­er, tes­ti­fied at the penal­ty phase that her fam­i­ly want­ed him to be giv­en life in…

A for­mer Pennsylvania police chief was sen­tenced to life with­out parole on June 20, 2008, for the mur­der of his 31-year old ex-wife after the vic­tim’s fam­i­ly spoke against a death sen­tence at the penal­ty hear­ing. The dis­trict attor­ney had planned to seek the death penal­ty against Richard Curran, just as he had for every mur­der case in the last 13 years. However, Bonnie Smith, the victim’s moth­er, tes­ti­fied at the penal­ty phase that her fam­i­ly want­ed him to be giv­en life in…

A for­mer Pennsylvania police chief was sen­tenced to life with­out parole on June 20, 2008, for the mur­der of his 31-year old ex-wife after the vic­tim’s fam­i­ly spoke against a death sen­tence at the penal­ty hear­ing. The dis­trict attor­ney had planned to seek the death penal­ty against Richard Curran, just as he had for every mur­der case in the last 13 years. However, Bonnie Smith, the victim’s moth­er, tes­ti­fied at the penal­ty phase that her fam­i­ly want­ed him to be giv­en life in prison. ​“Smith made…

Prof. James Acker has pub­lished an arti­cle in the lat­est edi­tion of the Vermont Law Review enti­tled, ​“Be Careful What You Ask For: Lessons from New York’s Recent Experience with Capital Punishment.” The arti­cle explores the var­i­ous stan­dards by which the death penal­ty was eval­u­at­ed dur­ing the last decade in New York. The pub­lic debate first addressed the ques­tion of, ​“Is it right?” with a focus on ret­ri­bu­tion, moral­i­ty and reli­gion. The sec­ond set of ques­tions addressed was, ​“Is it…

On June 16, 2008, the Council of the European Union (EU) meet­ing in Luxembourg released a state­ment on General Affairs and External Relations. The doc­u­ment con­tained a restate­ment of its 1998 Human Rights Guideline on the death penal­ty. The Council, con­sist­ing of almost all Foreign Ministers in the EU, stat­ed that it ​“reaf­firms that work­ing towards uni­ver­sal abo­li­tion of the death penal­ty con­sti­tutes an inte­gral objec­tive of the EU’s human rights pol­i­cy.” The Council reassert­ed the…

UPDATE: The Texas District Court judge that set Charles Hood’s exe­cu­tion date has with­drawn the war­rant for exe­cu­tion and recused him­self from the case, there­by like­ly delay­ing the exe­cu­tion indef­i­nite­ly. Hood’s attor­neys filed a motion for dis­cov­ery of infor­ma­tion about the affair between the judge and pros­e­cu­tor at Hood’s tri­al. (Dallas Morning News, June 17, 2008). Hood was grant­ed a 30-day reprieve by the gov­er­nor.Charles Hood is sched­uled to be exe­cut­ed in…