Publications & Testimony

Testimony and Statements on the Death Penalty

FROM DPIC

For tes­ti­mo­ny by for­mer Executive Director Robert Dunham and for­mer Executive Director Richard C. Dieter, please vis­it our page DPIC Testimony.
 

FROM RELIGIOUS LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS

FROM THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY 

FROM ADVOCACY GROUPS

FROM JUDGES, LEGISLATORS, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS

FROM MURDER VICTIMSFAMILY MEMBERS

Items: 4531 — 4540


Jun 24, 2008

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Two Death Penalty Cases

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on June 24 to hear two death penal­ty cas­es, both from Tennessee. The first case, Cone v. Bell, No. 07 – 1114, focus­es on whether fed­er­al courts can con­sid­er issues that state courts dis­missed on state pro­ce­dur­al grounds. The peti­tion­er, Gary Cone, had claimed that his use of drugs mit­i­gat­ed his guilt in the under­ly­ing mur­der of which he was accused. The pros­e­cu­tion at tri­al denied that there was any evidence of…

Read More

Jun 23, 2008

Police Chief Given Life after Victim’s Family Speaks Against Death Sentence

A for­mer Pennsylvania police chief was sen­tenced to life with­out parole on June 20, 2008, for the mur­der of his 31-year old ex-wife after the vic­tim’s fam­i­ly spoke against a death sen­tence at the penal­ty hear­ing. The dis­trict attor­ney had planned to seek the death penal­ty against Richard Curran, just as he had for every mur­der case in the last 13 years. However, Bonnie Smith, the victim’s moth­er, tes­ti­fied at the penal­ty phase that her fam­i­ly want­ed him to…

Read More

Jun 23, 2008

Police Chief Given Life after Victim’s Family Speaks Against Death Sentence

A for­mer Pennsylvania police chief was sen­tenced to life with­out parole on June 20, 2008, for the mur­der of his 31-year old ex-wife after the vic­tim’s fam­i­ly spoke against a death sen­tence at the penal­ty hear­ing. The dis­trict attor­ney had planned to seek the death penal­ty against Richard Curran, just as he had for every mur­der case in the last 13 years. However, Bonnie Smith, the victim’s moth­er, tes­ti­fied at the penal­ty phase that her fam­i­ly want­ed him to…

Read More

Jun 23, 2008

Police Chief Given Life after Victim’s Family Speaks Against Death Sentence

A for­mer Pennsylvania police chief was sen­tenced to life with­out parole on June 20, 2008, for the mur­der of his 31-year old ex-wife after the vic­tim’s fam­i­ly spoke against a death sen­tence at the penal­ty hear­ing. The dis­trict attor­ney had planned to seek the death penal­ty against Richard Curran, just as he had for every mur­der case in the last 13 years. However, Bonnie Smith, the victim’s moth­er, tes­ti­fied at the penal­ty phase that her fam­i­ly want­ed him to be given life…

Read More

Jun 20, 2008

NEW RESOURCES: Lessons from New York’s Recent Experience with Capital Punishment”

Prof. James Acker has pub­lished an arti­cle in the lat­est edi­tion of the Vermont Law Review entitled, ​“Be Careful What You Ask For: Lessons from New York’s Recent Experience with Capital Punishment.” The arti­cle explores the var­i­ous stan­dards by which the death penal­ty was eval­u­at­ed dur­ing the last decade in New York. The pub­lic debate first addressed the ques­tion of,​“Is it right?” with a focus on ret­ri­bu­tion, moral­i­ty and reli­gion. The sec­ond set of questions…

Read More

Jun 19, 2008

European Union Reasserts Its Opposition to the Death Penalty in All Countries and All Cases

On June 16, 2008, the Council of the European Union (EU) meet­ing in Luxembourg released a state­ment on General Affairs and External Relations. The doc­u­ment con­tained a restate­ment of its 1998 Human Rights Guideline on the death penal­ty. The Council, con­sist­ing of almost all Foreign Ministers in the EU, stat­ed that it​“reaf­firms that work­ing towards uni­ver­sal abo­li­tion of the death penal­ty con­sti­tutes an inte­gral objec­tive of the EU’s human rights pol­i­cy.” The…

Read More

Jun 18, 2008

CONFLICT OF INTEREST RAISED IN UPCOMING TEXAS EXECUTION

UPDATE: The Texas District Court judge that set Charles Hood’s exe­cu­tion date has with­drawn the war­rant for exe­cu­tion and recused him­self from the case, there­by like­ly delay­ing the exe­cu­tion indef­i­nite­ly. Hood’s attor­neys filed a motion for dis­cov­ery of infor­ma­tion about the affair between the judge and pros­e­cu­tor at Hood’s tri­al. (Dallas Morning News, June 17, 2008). Hood was grant­ed a 30-day reprieve by the gov­er­nor.Charles Hood is scheduled…

Read More

Jun 18, 2008

Texas Inmate Granted Execution Reprieve After Confusion in the Courts

Charles Hood was placed in the death cham­ber sev­er­al times on June 17 before Texas announced that it would be unable to fol­low its lethal injec­tion pro­to­col pri­or to mid­night when the exe­cu­tion war­rant expired. The day was filled with appeal fil­ings, court deci­sions, and dis­missals right until the mid­night dead­line. The con­tro­ver­sy began a week ago when Hood’s attor­neys filed motions assert­ing that the pre­sid­ing judge and lead prosecutor had…

Read More

Jun 17, 2008

NEW RESOURCES: Why Some Countries Have the Death Penalty and Others Do Not

A new study has been released that explores the cor­re­la­tions between coun­tries’ legal, polit­i­cal, and reli­gious sys­tems and their use of the death penal­ty. Professors David Greenberg from New York University and Valerie West of John Jay College exam­ined data from 193 nations to test why some coun­tries reg­u­lar­ly use cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment while oth­ers have aban­doned it alto­geth­er. They found,​“In part, a country’s death penal­ty sta­tus is linked to its…

Read More

Jun 16, 2008

NEW VOICES: Another Texas Death Penalty Official Has Second Thoughts

Larry Fitzgerald served as the offi­cial spokesman for Texas exe­cu­tions for eight years. He rep­re­sent­ed the state through 219 lethal injec­tions. Retired in August 2003, Fitzgerald left with what he refers to as a,​“PhD in prison life.” Due to his exper­tise with the Texas prison sys­tem, defense attor­neys have been uti­liz­ing his tes­ti­mo­ny in death penal­ty cas­es to describe to the jury why the prison sys­tem offers a suit­able alternative to…

Read More