Publications & Testimony

Items: 4571 — 4580


Mar 27, 2008

Maryland Approves Death Penalty Study Commission

On March 24, Maryland law­mak­ers vot­ed to cre­ate a com­mis­sion to study the state’s death penal­ty. The House vot­ed 89 – 48 and the Senate by 32 – 15 to estab­lish the Maryland Commission on Capital Punishment to research racial, socio-eco­nom­i­­cal, and geo­graph­ic dis­par­i­ties in the appli­ca­tion of the death penal­ty as well as eval­u­ate the risk of exe­cut­ing an inno­cent per­son. The com­mis­sion will con­sid­er the costs of the death penal­ty as com­pared to a sentence of…

Read More

Mar 26, 2008

STUDIES: Prosecutorial Discretion and Capital Punishment in Missouri”

A recent Arizona Legal Studies paper on mur­der cas­es in Missouri found both geo­graph­i­cal and racial dis­par­i­ties in the appli­ca­tion of the death penal­ty.​“Life and Death Decisions: Prosecutorial Discretion and Capital Punishment in Missouri,” by Katherine Barnes of Arizona University Law School, and David Sloss and Stephen Thaman of St. Louis Univeristy Law School, stud­ied 1046 cas­es of inten­tion­al homi­cide in Missouri to deter­mine geo­graph­i­cal and racial effects in the…

Read More

Mar 25, 2008

U.S. Supreme Court Exempts Texas Courts from World Court Ruling

On March 25, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6 – 3 in Medellin v. Texas (No. 06 – 984) that the President does not have the author­i­ty to order states to bypass their pro­ce­dur­al rules and com­ply with a rul­ing from the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The case arose from an appeal by Jose Medellin, a Mexican cit­i­zen on Texas’ death row who, along with 50 oth­er Mexican death row inmates, filed suit in the ICJ alleg­ing a vio­la­tion of their rights under the Vienna Convention…

Read More

Mar 25, 2008

Georgia Rejects Non-Unanimous Jury Verdicts Proposal

On March 20, the Georgia State Senate over­whelm­ing­ly (44 – 7) reject­ed a pro­pos­al that would have allowed non-unan­i­­mous jury sen­tenc­ing ver­dicts in cap­i­tal cas­es. The pro­pos­al would have per­mit­ted a judge to impose a death sen­tence when at least 10 of 12 jurors sup­port­ed it. Current Georgia law requires that the jury vote unan­i­mous­ly for a death sen­tence. Some oppo­nents of the bill said it would have put Georgia’s entire death penal­ty law in jeop­ardy. (All other…

Read More

Mar 25, 2008

Medellin v. Texas

On March 25, 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6 – 3 in Medellin v. Texas (No. 06 – 984) that the President does not have the author­i­ty to order states to bypass their pro­ce­dur­al rules and com­ply with a rul­ing from the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Even apart from the President’s pow­ers, the Court held that Texas is not oblig­at­ed to give Mr. Medellin an addi­tion­al hear­ing because the Protocol gov­ern­ing the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations is not…

Read More

Mar 24, 2008

After Two Supreme Court Reversals, Texas Man Sentenced to Life

Thomas Miller-El received a life sen­tence from a Texas judge after plead­ing guilty to a Dallas mur­der in exchange for the pros­e­cu­tion’s agree­ment not to seek the death penal­ty. Miller-El had orig­i­nal­ly been sen­tenced to death in 1986. He raised an appeal assert­ing that poten­tial black jurors had been improp­er­ly stopped from serv­ing at his tri­al. The appeal was denied by the low­er courts, but the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (8 – 1) in 2003 that he should have been…

Read More

Mar 20, 2008

New Poll Finds Increase in Opposition to Death Penalty

A recent Harris Interactive poll of over 1,000 American adults found that the num­ber of peo­ple who oppose the death penal­ty has increased since 2003. Thirty-per­­cent (30%) of those sam­pled oppose the death penal­ty, an increase of 8 per­cent­age points in the past 5 years. The per­cent­age of respon­dents who​“believe in cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment” has dropped sig­nif­i­cant­ly since 1997, when 75% sup­port­ed the death penal­ty. In 2008, that num­ber had declined to 63%, the lowest…

Read More

Mar 19, 2008

Supreme Court Strikes Down Conviction of Death Row Inmate Because of Bias in Jury Selection

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7 – 2 on March 19 that the con­vic­tion and death sen­tence of Allen Snyder should be over­turned because the tri­al judge allowed a poten­tial juror to be reject­ed on what appeared to be racial grounds. The deci­sion, writ­ten by Justice Samuel Alito, focused on the elim­i­na­tion of an African-American man from jury pan­el. The Court reject­ed the pros­e­cu­tion’s non-racial rea­sons for strik­ing this juror:​“The implau­si­bil­i­ty of this explanation is…

Read More

Mar 17, 2008

NEW VOICES: U.S. Attorney General Opposes Death Sentences in Military Commission Trials

U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey said that he hopes that the Guantanamo pris­on­ers accused of ter­ror­ism do not receive the death penal­ty in the upcom­ing Military Commission tri­als because it would give them the mar­tyr­dom that they want. In a recent talk to British eco­nom­ic stu­dents, Mukasey said he sup­ports the death penal­ty, but,​“In a way I kind of hope from a per­son­al stand­point … I kind of hope they don’t get it. Because many of them want to be martyrs .…”…

Read More

Mar 17, 2008

Georgia Supreme Court Denies New Trial to Death Row Inmate with Innocence Claim

On March 17, the Georgia Supreme Court vot­ed 4 – 3 against Troy Davis’ request for a new tri­al. Davis, who is on death row for the 1989 mur­der of a police offi­cer, claims he is inno­cent and that he was a vic­tim of mis­tak­en iden­ti­ty. Since his tri­al in 1991, sev­en of the wit­ness­es called by the pros­e­cu­tion have recant­ed their tes­ti­mo­ny. Chief Justice Leah Ward Sears wrote in the dis­sent­ing opin­ion that Davis should at least have a hear­ing because,​“In this case,…

Read More