Publications & Testimony

Items: 4821 — 4830


Jul 01, 2007

A Crisis of Confidence: Americans’ Doubts About the Death Penalty — MEDIA COVERAGE REPORT

On June 9, 2007 the Death Penalty Information Center released its new report,​“A Crisis of Confidence: Americans’ Doubts About the Death Penalty.” The report, based on results from DPIC’s nation­al pub­lic opin­ion poll, received exten­sive nation­al media cov­er­age in major papers and elec­tron­ic media. In addi­tion, the report was dis­cussed exten­sive­ly on more than 25 Internet blogs, includ­ing many online crim­i­nal jus­tice groups. Among the news orga­ni­za­tions that featured this…

Read More

Jun 28, 2007

NEW VOICES: Scientific American on the Death Penalty: Bad Execution”

The July 2007 issue of Scientific American mag­a­zine con­tains both an arti­cle dis­cussing the med­ical impli­ca­tions of lethal injec­tion and an edi­to­r­i­al dis­cussing the humane­ness of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment gen­er­al­ly. The edi­to­r­i­al sug­gests that cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment​“can nev­er be any­thing but inhu­mane,” and offers the opin­ion that it is​“wrong” and an​“out­rage.” But it fur­ther states that even those who believe the death penal­ty is accept­able, should agree that…

Read More

Jun 28, 2007

Thurgood Marshall Journalism Awards 2007

Thurgood Marshall Journalism Awards — 2007 The Death Penalty Information Center is proud to announce the win­ners of the orga­ni­za­tion’s 11th Annual Thurgood Marshall Journalism Awards. The awards hon­or jour­nal­ists who have made an excep­tion­al con­tri­bu­tion to cov­er­age of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment issues. This year’s cer­e­mo­ny was held at the National Press…

Read More

Jun 28, 2007

Supreme Court Blocks Execution of Mentally Ill Inmate

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on June 28, 2007, that Scott Panetti, a man with severe men­tal ill­ness on Texas’s death row, deserves a rehear­ing on his claim of men­tal incom­pe­tence. The Court’s 5 – 4 rul­ing over­turned a deci­sion by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that had used an over­ly restric­tive def­i­n­i­tion of what con­sti­tutes insan­i­ty. The low­er court had held that mere knowl­edge of one’s crime, with­out a ratio­nal under­stand­ing, was…

Read More

Jun 26, 2007

ACLU Releases Report on Racial Disparities in the Federal Death Penalty

The fed­er­al death penal­ty impacts racial minori­ties dif­fer­ent­ly than it does whites accord­ing to a recent report from the American Civil Liberties Union. The report, The Persistent Problem of Racial Disparities in the Federal Death Penalty, notes that defen­dants of col­or make up the major­i­ty of the fed­er­al death row. And the risk of a case being autho­rized for the death penal­ty is 84% high­er in cas­es where the vic­tim is white, regard­less of the race of the defen­dant. The…

Read More

Jun 25, 2007

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Louisiana Case with All-White Jury and References to O.J. Simpson

On June 25, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a cap­i­tal case from Louisiana in which an all-white jury sen­tenced a defen­dant to death after the pros­e­cu­tor urged a death sen­tence so that the defen­dant would not​“get away with it” like O.J. Simpson. All five qual­i­fied African-Americans had been struck from the jury pool by the pros­e­cu­tion using peremp­to­ry chal­lenges. The defense has chal­lenged the selec­tion of the jury as a violation of…

Read More

Jun 21, 2007

Pew Poll Shows Modest Decline in Death Penalty Support

The Pew Research Center recent­ly released a poll on a vari­ety of social issues, includ­ing the death penal­ty. The poll found that 64% of the U.S. adults sup­port the impo­si­tion of the death penal­ty for per­sons con­vict­ed of mur­der. This is a decline of 14 per­cent­age points from 1996, when 78% of respon­dents said they sup­port­ed it. The Center report­ed that sup­port for the death penal­ty was high­er among men than women, and was sub­stan­tial­ly high­er among whites (69%)…

Read More

Jun 21, 2007

Strong Criticism of Tennessee’s Death Penalty System from Federal Appellate Judge

Dissenting from a U.S. Court of Appeals deci­sion deny­ing relief to Gary Cone, Judge Merritt sharply crit­i­cized the Tennessee Attorney General for​“fal­si­fi­ca­tion” of the record, and he referred to the state’s judi­cial sys­tem as​“bro­ken” and​“inat­ten­tive.” Cone had been grant­ed relief on two oth­er occa­sions by the same Sixth Circuit, but those deci­sions were reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court. In the present case, Cone claimed that sig­nif­i­cant mit­i­gat­ing evidence had…

Read More

Jun 20, 2007

BOOKS: DeathQuest III by Robert Bohm

In the third edi­tion of what some have called​“the first true text­book on the death penal­ty,” author Robert Bohm, a cor­rec­tion­al offi­cer turned col­lege pro­fes­sor, engages the read­er with a full account of the argu­ments and issues sur­round­ing cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. His book, ​“DeathQuest III: An Introduction to the Theory & Practice of Capital Punishment in the United States,” begins with the his­to­ry of the death penal­ty from colo­nial to mod­ern times, and then…

Read More

Jun 19, 2007

Texas Scores Poorly in Mental Health Services While Executing Many with Mental Illness

A recent study con­duct­ed by the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) has revealed that Texas is almost last among states in spend­ing on men­tal health ser­vices and per­forms poor­ly in oth­er men­tal health areas. According to the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, Texas ranked 47th in the nation in per-capi­­ta spend­ing on men­tal health ser­vices, and received a grade of​“D” for infor­ma­tion access and a grade of…

Read More