Publications & Testimony

Items: 5201 — 5210


Apr 03, 2006

Former North Carolina Prosecutor Accused of Withholding Evidence in Second Capital Case

Former Union County pros­e­cu­tor Scott Brewer, who is already under inves­ti­ga­tion for alleged­ly obstruct­ing jus­tice in the 1996 death penal­ty tri­al of John Gregory Hoffman, has been accused of with­hold­ing impor­tant evi­dence in a sec­ond cap­i­tal tri­al. Attorneys rep­re­sent­ing Darrell Strickland have asked the North Carolina State Bar to dis­ci­pline Brewer for improp­er­ly with­hold­ing three state­ments made by the vic­tims’ wife, Gail Brown, the only eye­wit­ness to the crime for which their client was…

Read More

Mar 30, 2006

The Impact of the Death Penalty on Jurors

During a recent pre­sen­ta­tion at Valparaiso University, Sister Helen Prejean (pic­tured) engaged in a dis­cus­sion with the school’s pas­tor, Rev. Joseph Cunningham. Responding to a remark that Prejean had made about defense attor­neys only need­ing to con­vince one juror to vote against the death penal­ty, Cunningham told Prejean that he had been fore­man of a jury that sen­tenced a man to death in 1995. He remarked that he is still deal­ing with the emo­tion­al toll of that expe­ri­ence, stat­ing, I ache…

Read More

Mar 29, 2006

NEW RESOURCES: Michael Meltsner’s The Making of a Civil Rights Lawyer”

A new book by Michael Meltsner, The Making of a Civil Rights Lawyer, pro­vides a per­son­al his­to­ry of the civ­il rights move­ment from the per­spec­tive of an attor­ney com­mit­ted to social change. Meltsner’s writ­ings bring to life a sem­i­nal peri­od of legal reform in U.S. his­to­ry. The book dis­cuss­es famous cas­es and the turn­ing points in the civ­il rights and death penal­ty move­ments. Stephen Bright of the Southern Center for Human Rights notes, Michael Meltsner has per­formed a great public…

Read More

Mar 29, 2006

NEW RESOURCES: American Bar Association’s Achieving Justice: Freeing the Innocent, Convicting the Guilty”

The American Bar Association’s Criminial Justice Section has released a new report on pre­vent­ing wrong­ful con­vic­tions. The report, Achieving Justice: Freeing the Innocent, Convicting the Guilty, includes com­men­tary and res­o­lu­tions that address­es top­ics such as false con­fes­sions, eye­wit­ness iden­ti­fi­ca­tion pro­ce­dures, use of foren­sic evi­dence, jail­house infor­mants, and com­pen­sa­tion for the wrong­ful­ly con­vict­ed. The report is the result of a three-year ABA effort led by an ad hoc group…

Read More

Mar 28, 2006

SENTENCING: American Judicature Society Releases Death Sentence Numbers for 2005

The Capital Case Data Project of the American Judicature Society announced their count of 125 new death sen­tences in 2005, one less than in 2004. In addi­tion, AJS count­ed 14 death sen­tences imposed through new sen­tence pro­ceed­ings after appel­late rever­sals. Those sen­tenced to death includ­ed 63 white defen­dants, 57 black defen­dants, and 15 Hispanics. The largest num­ber of death sen­tences were imposed in California (19) and Florida (16). Texas had 14 death sen­tences, down considerably…

Read More

Mar 27, 2006

NEW VOICES: Victims Do Not Necessarily Want Revenge

Victims of vio­lence and ter­ror are not nec­es­sar­i­ly well served by a sys­tem that promis­es clo­sure” in the form of the death penal­ty, accord­ing to a recent Washington Post col­umn by Dahlia Lithwick. Among oth­er cas­es, the author ques­tions the assump­tions in the fed­er­al gov­ern­men­t’s case against Zacarias Moussaoui as it relates to the needs of the fam­i­ly mem­bers from the September 11th attack: The death penal­ty tri­al of Zacarias Moussaoui has been tout­ed by the gov­ern­ment as a way to bring…

Read More

Mar 27, 2006

Supreme Court May Be Tied About a Tie in Kansas Death Penalty Law

The U.S. Supreme Court announced on March 24 that it will rehear Kansas v. Marsh. This case involves the con­sti­tu­tion­al­i­ty of Kansas’ death penal­ty law, which was struck down by the state Supreme Court in 2004. Kansas law required a death sen­tence if the jury found that there was an equal bal­ance between the aggra­vat­ing and mit­i­gat­ing fac­tors pre­sent­ed at the sen­tenc­ing hear­ing. The U.S. Supreme Court heard argu­ments ear­li­er in December when Justice O’Connor was still on the Court. Now that…

Read More

Mar 26, 2006

Does Killing Really Give Closure?

March 26, 2006Does Killing Really Give Closure?By Dahlia LithwickThe past few weeks have been rife with the prospect of clo­sure denied.The fam­i­lies of Slobodan Milosevic’s tens of thou­sands of vic­tims were osten­si­bly denied clo­sure when he died before the con­clu­sion of his war crimes tri­bunal. The deci­sion over where to try exiled Liberian ruler Charles Taylor turns large­ly on how to afford clo­sure to his vic­tims. And the fam­i­lies of those killed in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks despaired that…

Read More

Mar 24, 2006

OPINION POLLS: Majority of New Yorkers Reject the Death Penalty

Most New Yorkers would choose a sen­tence of life with­out parole (LWOP) over the death penal­ty for those con­vict­ed of mur­der. In a recent poll pub­lished in Newsday, 53% of N.Y. adults said LWOP is the bet­ter penal­ty, where­as only 38% chose the death penal­ty, with 9% uncer­tain. New York’s death penal­ty was found uncon­sti­tu­tion­al by the state’s high­est court in 2004. The leg­is­la­ture elect­ed not to modify the…

Read More