ABC News

Aug. 19 — Greg Wilhoit remem­bers his des­per­a­tion as he was brought in to his cell­block at the State Penitentiary in McAlester, Okla.

I thought, My life’s over, lit­er­al­ly over,” he says. As pris­on­er 100841, Wilhoit faced the death penal­ty after a jury found him guilty in 1987 of his wife’s murder.

A year lat­er, Ron Williamson — Wilhoit’s new neigh­bor across the hall in cell­block F — could not believe he was liv­ing among killers. I’ve nev­er been so mis­er­able in my entire life, being down there among those mur­der­ers and nev­er hav­ing ever killed any­body,” he says.

McAlester’s death row is a grim place; since 1990, 30 men have been exe­cut­ed there. For most, the only way out is by dying.

But these two men found anoth­er way. Like most inmates on death row, Wilhoit and Williamson argued they were inno­cent. And their deter­mi­na­tion to prove it became the basis for an unusu­al bond that would ulti­mate­ly save their lives.

Learning to Trust
Wilhoit’s night­mare began in 1985 when his wife Kathryn was beat­en and stran­gled. Neighbors found her body when they respond­ed to the cries of the couple’s two infant daugh­ters. Wilhoit, an iron­work­er, had recent­ly sep­a­rat­ed from Kathryn, and although he insist­ed on his inno­cence he had no ali­bi on the night of the crime. He was found guilty and sent to death row.

Williamson was also con­vict­ed of a bru­tal killing. Once a star base­ball play­er — promis­ing enough to be draft­ed by the Oakland A’s orga­ni­za­tion — an injury end­ed his career. His path to death row began in 1982, when Debra Carter, a 22-year-old wait­ress, was found raped and stran­gled in her apart­ment in Ada, Okla. A lon­er in town, with a police record and men­tal prob­lems, Williamson became the tar­get of the inves­ti­ga­tion. Five years after the crime he and a co-defen­dant were con­vict­ed, and Williamson arrived at McAlester in 1988.

When he first arrived to cell­block F — where vio­lent attacks from
fel­low con­victs were a con­stant threat — Williamson kept to him­self. After a while, Wilhoit says they start­ed to have small con­ver­sa­tions. From those con­ver­sa­tions behind bars, the fear and sus­pi­cion cen­tral to prison life slow­ly turned to a friendship.

Our friend­ship evolved enough where we felt com­fort­able with each oth­er to go out in the yard,” Wilhoit says.
Over time, their bond and trust deep­ened. We didn’t hide any­thing from one anoth­er,” Williamson says.

They also became con­vinced of each other’s inno­cence. After por­ing over the 5,000 page tran­script of Williamson’s tri­al, Wilhoit says he thought his friend had been rail­road­ed. In Wilhoit’s case, the tes­ti­mo­ny of two den­tists — expert wit­ness­es for the pros­e­cu­tion — con­vinced the jury that a bite mark on the body of his mur­dered wife came from him. After a two-week tri­al, he was found guilty of first-degree mur­der, and the jury rec­om­mend­ed the death penalty.

Lucky Break
Wilhoit suf­fered on death row for more than four years. His only hope was Mark Barrett, the pub­lic defend­er han­dling his appeal. Barrett says Wilhoit’s main prob­lem was his first lawyer’s incompetence.

His lawyer was the town drunk by the time of Wilhoit’s tri­al,” Barrett says. Enough of a town drunk that he had wet him­self in some court rooms, [and] thrown up in the judge’s chambers.”

For years, Barrett fought to have the bite mark re-test­ed. Finally, 11 top foren­sic spe­cial­ists reached a unan­i­mous con­clu­sion — there was no match. In 1993, Wilhoit was grant­ed a new tri­al. Once again, the pros­e­cu­tion said he had bru­tal­ly killed his wife. But this time, there was no evi­dence to back it up. Halfway through, the judge stopped the pro­ceed­ings and set Wilhoit free.

Meanwhile, time was run­ning out for Ron Williamson. His sis­ter even received a let­ter from the prison describ­ing the cor­rect pro­ce­dure to claim his body. But when things seemed most des­per­ate, Williamson got a break. Barrett, the same pub­lic defend­er who got Wilhoit released, helped pin­point crit­i­cal mis­takes in Williamson’s conviction.

Ron’s case and Greg’s case are great­ly sim­i­lar in that they had bad sci­en­tif­ic evi­dence and bad lawyer­ing that was ulti­mate­ly made some­what right through bet­ter sci­en­tif­ic evi­dence,” Barrett says.

For Williamson, stray hairs were at the cen­ter of the prosecution’s case against him. Twelve years ear­li­er, a few strands of hair found on the vic­tim had been linked to Williamson and his co-defen­dant sim­ply by the way they looked under a micro­scope. But in 1999, the DNA with­in the hairs was exam­ined and Barrett and co-coun­sel Barry Scheck proved their clients were inno­cent. With his friend Greg Wilhoit stand­ing in the court­room, and after endur­ing more than a decade in prison, Williamson was final­ly told he was free to go.

Today, the two for­mer prison bud­dies have rekin­dled their friend­ship on the out­side. And even though they both lived through years of injus­tice, they are over­whelm­ing­ly thank­ful — for their friend­ship and for life. Recently, after vis­it­ing McAlester with Williamson and 20/​20, Wilhoit summed it all up. It’s such a good feel­ing to know that I can leave when­ev­er I want to,” he said. And I can take my bud­dy Ron with me.”