In-Depth Reports

Latest


Jul 01, 2024

Lethal Election: How the U.S. Electoral Process Increases the Arbitrariness of the Death Penalty

Elected supreme court jus­tices in Georgia, North Carolina, and Ohio are twice as like­ly to affirm death penal­ty cas­es dur­ing an elec­tion year than in any oth­er year. This effect is sta­tis­ti­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant when con­trol­ling for the num­ber of cas­es each year. Changing pub­lic opin­ion means that zeal­ous sup­port for the death penal­ty is no longer a lit­mus test for elect­ed offi­cials in many death penal­ty juris­dic­tions. Today’s elec­tions fea­ture viable can­di­dates who criticize use…

Read More

Sep 15, 2020

Enduring Injustice: the Persistence of Racial Discrimination in the U.S. Death Penalty

(Washington, D.C.) As social move­ments pres­sure pol­i­cy­mak­ers to redress injus­tices in the crim­i­nal legal sys­tem and to insti­tute reforms to make the process more fair and equi­table, the Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC) today released, Enduring Injustice: the Persistence of Racial Discrimination in the U.S. Death Penalty.” This report pro­vides an in-depth look at the his­tor­i­cal role that race has played in the death penal­ty and details the per­va­sive role racial discrimination continues…

Read More

Nov 10, 2015

Battle Scars: Military Veterans and the Death Penalty

In many respects, vet­er­ans in the United States are again receiv­ing the respect and grat­i­tude they deserve for hav­ing risked their lives and served their coun­try. Wounded sol­diers are wel­comed home, and their courage in start­ing a new and dif­fi­cult jour­ney in civil­ian life is right­ly applaud­ed. But some vet­er­ans with debil­i­tat­ing scars from their time in com­bat have received a very dif­fer­ent recep­tion. They have been judged to be the worst of the worst” crim­i­nals, deprived of mercy,…

Read More