Publications & Testimony

Items: 2011 — 2020


Jun 12, 2017

Kentucky Attorneys Argue to Expand Juvenile Death Penalty Exemption, Citing Neurological Studies

Defense attor­neys for Travis Bredhold, a Kentucky defen­dant fac­ing the death penal­ty for a mur­der com­mit­ted when he was 18 years old, are ask­ing a judge to extend the death-penal­ty exemp­tion for juve­nile offend­ers to those younger than age 21. In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court (pic­tured) ruled in Roper v. Simmons that the death penal­ty was uncon­sti­tu­tion­al­ly cru­el and unusu­al pun­ish­ment when applied to offend­ers who were under age 18

Read More

Jun 09, 2017

Duane Buck’s Lawyer Discusses How Future Dangerousness Taints Texas Death Penalty System

Thirty years ago, film­mak­er Errol Morris, who direct­ed the doc­u­men­tary The Thin Blue Line,” helped to exon­er­ate Texas death-row pris­on­er Dale Adams, false­ly accused of mur­der­ing a police offi­cer. During the course of mak­ing the film, Morris met the noto­ri­ous Texas pros­e­cu­tion psy­chi­a­trist, Dr. James Grigson, who rou­tine­ly tes­ti­fied that cap­i­tal defen­dants — includ­ing the inno­cent Mr. Adams — posed a risk of future…

Read More

Jun 09, 2017

Ayestas v. Davis: Briefing Page

QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Fifth Circuit erred in hold­ing that 18 U.S.C. § 3599(f) with­holds rea­son­ably nec­es­sary” resources to inves­ti­gate and devel­op an inef­fec­tive- assis­tance-of-coun­sel claim that state habeas coun­sel for­feit­ed, where the claimant’s exist­ing evi­dence does not meet the ulti­mate bur­den of proof at the time the § 3599(f) motion is…

Read More

Jun 08, 2017

BOOKS: Exonerated” Tells the Story of the Innocence Movement

Exonerated: A History of the Innocence Movement, by Robert J. Norris, describes the rise of the inno­cence move­ment,” the lawyers, inves­ti­ga­tors, jour­nal­ists, law­mak­ers, and orga­ni­za­tions that have worked to uncov­er wrong­ful con­vic­tions, edu­cate the pub­lic about the prob­lem, and reform the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem to pre­vent future mis­takes. For the book, Norris inter­viewed 37 key lead­ers on the issue, includ­ing Innocence Project co-founders Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld, and Rob…

Read More

Jun 07, 2017

Death Sentence Commuted, Kevin Keith Presses Innocence Claim in Ohio Appeals Court

An Ohio appeals court heard argu­ment on June 6 on whether to grant a new tri­al to for­mer death-row pris­on­er Kevin Keith (pic­tured), whose death sen­tence was com­mut­ed to life with­out parole by Ohio Governor Ted Strickland in 2010 amid con­cerns that he may be inno­cent. Keith, who has con­sis­tent­ly main­tained his inno­cence of the three 1994 mur­ders for which he was sen­tenced to death, pre­sent­ed argu­ment to the Ohio Court of Appeals for the 3rd

Read More

Jun 06, 2017

Recent Jury Trials in Dallas Highlight Death Penalty Decline Across Texas

From 2007 to 2013, Dallas sen­tenced twelve cap­i­tal­ly charged defen­dants to death — more than any oth­er coun­ty in Texas—and Dallas ranks sec­ond nation­al­ly, behind only Harris County (Houston), in the num­ber it has exe­cut­ed since 1972. But the coun­ty has not imposed any new death sen­tences since then, and the recent life sen­tences in the cap­i­tal tri­als of Justin Smith and Erbie Bowser high­light a statewide trend…

Read More

Jun 05, 2017

Federal Court Grants Lethal-Injection Stay to Alabama Prisoner With Claims of Attorney Abandonment, Flawed Forensics

Robert Melson (pic­tured), an Alabama death-row pris­on­er whose clemen­cy peti­tion alleges that aban­don­ment by his post-con­vic­tion lawyers pre­vent­ed him from ade­quate­ly chal­leng­ing the flawed foren­sic evi­dence in his case, received a stay of exe­cu­tion from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit on a chal­lenge to Alabama’s lethal-injec­tion pro­to­col. Melson was con­vict­ed of three mur­ders at a Popeye’s restau­rant in 1994. A sur­vivor of the crime recognized…

Read More

Jun 02, 2017

Indiana Appeals Court Voids State’s Lethal-Injection Protocol

The Indiana Court of Appeals has void­ed the state’s lethal-injec­tion pro­to­col. In a rul­ing on June 1, 2017, the state inter­me­di­ate appeals court held that the Indiana Department of Corrections (DOC) had failed to com­ply with state rule­mak­ing pro­ce­dures when it adopt­ed a nev­er-before-used exe­cu­tion pro­to­col with­out pub­lic notice or com­ment. In 2014, the DOC announced that it had adopt­ed a new exe­cu­tion pro­to­col infor­mal­ly as an inter­nal DOC pol­i­cy.” The pro­to­col called for a…

Read More