Publications & Testimony

Items: 2041 — 2050


Sep 12, 2017

NEW PODCAST: DPIC Study Finds No Evidence that Death Penalty Deters Murder or Protects Police

A Death Penalty Information Center analy­sis of U.S. mur­der data from 1987 through 2015 has found no evi­dence that the death penal­ty deters mur­der or pro­tects police. Instead, the evi­dence shows that mur­der rates, includ­ing mur­ders of police offi­cers, are con­sis­tent­ly high­er in death-penal­ty states than in states that have abol­ished the death penal­ty. And far from expe­ri­enc­ing increas­es in mur­der rates or open sea­son on law enforce­ment, the data show that states that have abol­ished the death…

Read More

Sep 11, 2017

Sixteen Years Later, No Date in Sight for Death-Penalty Trial of Alleged 9/​11 Conspirators

Sixteen years lat­er, the alleged per­pe­tra­tors of the September 11, 2001 hijack­ings and attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center, and the down­ing of Flight 93, have yet to be tried, and issues relat­ing to the use of evi­dence obtained by tor­ture, the appro­pri­ate­ness and legal­i­ty of tri­als by mil­i­tary com­mis­sion, and where and how they should be tried raise ques­tions as to whether and when a tri­al may take place. The five men charged in the attack — alleged mas­ter­mind Khalid Sheikh…

Read More

Sep 08, 2017

Virginia, Pennsylvania Death Rows Smallest in a Quarter Century as Death Sentences Show Long-Term Decline

Death rows are shrink­ing nation­wide, and the expe­ri­ence in states like Virginia and Pennsylvania helps explain why. Virginia’s death row has fall­en from a report­ed high of 58 in 1995 to four in September 2017, the low­est it has been since 1979. Pennsylvania’s death row of 160 pris­on­ers is its small­est in near­ly 25 years — down from 175 last December and from a report­ed 247 in April…

Read More

Sep 06, 2017

Federal Appeals Court Sides with Alabama Prisoners on Lethal-Injection Case, Sends Back to District Court

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has issued a rul­ing reviv­ing a law­suit brought by Alabama death-row pris­on­ers that chal­lenged the con­sti­tu­tion­al­i­ty of the state’s three-drug exe­cu­tion pro­to­col using the con­tro­ver­sial lethal-injec­tion drug mida­zo­lam. The unan­i­mous deci­sion by the three-judge fed­er­al appeals pan­el on September 1 reversed a fed­er­al dis­trict court rul­ing against sev­er­al death-row pris­on­ers who sued the Alabama…

Read More

Sep 01, 2017

REPORT: Most of the 26 Prisoners Facing Execution in Ohio Through 2020 Severely Abused, Impaired, or Mentally Ill

Almost all of the 26 men sched­uled for exe­cu­tion in Ohio over the next three years suf­fer from men­tal, emo­tion­al, or cog­ni­tive impair­ments or lim­i­ta­tions that raise ques­tions as to whether they should have been sen­tenced to death, accord­ing to a new report released August 30 by Harvard’s Fair Punishment Project. While the U.S. Constitution requires that the death penal­ty be reserved for the worst crimes and the worst offend­ers, the report—Prisoners on…

Read More

Aug 31, 2017

Florida Supreme Court Upholds Removal of Prosecutor From Death-Eligible Cases

The Florida Supreme Court has upheld Governor Rick Scotts (pic­tured, left) removal of Orange and Osceola County State Attorney Aramis Ayala (pic­tured, right) as pros­e­cu­tor in more than two dozen mur­der cas­es because of her offi­cial pol­i­cy not to seek to seek the death penal­ty. Over two dis­sents, the sev­en-mem­ber Court held that Scott had act­ed well with­in the bounds of the Governor’s broad author­i­ty” when he replaced Ayala with Lake County…

Read More

Aug 29, 2017

Texas Execution Stayed to Permit Proper Consideration of Intellectual Disability Claim

A Texas appeals court has stayed the August 30 exe­cu­tion of Steven Long (pic­tured) to pro­vide him an oppor­tu­ni­ty to lit­i­gate a claim that he is inel­i­gi­ble for the death penal­ty because of intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty. On August 21, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals issued the stay and remand­ed Long’s case to a Dallas County tri­al court, direct­ing the court to recon­sid­er his claim of intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s…

Read More