Publications & Testimony

Items: 2441 — 2450


Mar 09, 2016

Texas About to Execute Inmate Despite Evidence of Intellectual Disability

UPDATE: Wesbrook was exe­cut­ed on Mar. 9. EARLIER: Coy Wesbrook is sched­uled to be exe­cut­ed in Texas on March 9. If the exe­cu­tion pro­ceeds, it will be the eighth in the U.S. this year, half of which have been in Texas. Wesbrook killed five peo­ple after a con­fronta­tion with his ex-wife. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that defen­dants with intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ty (for­mer­ly referred to as men­tal retar­da­tion”) are exempt from the death penalty.

Read More

Mar 08, 2016

EDITORIALS: Kentucky Newspaper Reverses Position on the Death Penalty

The Lexington Herald-Leader, Kentucky’s sec­ond-largest news­pa­per, announced it was end­ing its long-held sup­port for the death penal­ty, and now believes the state leg­is­la­ture should abol­ish cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. Describing its pre­vi­ous posi­tion as keep it but fix it,” the edi­tors stat­ed, we must now con­cede that the death penal­ty is not going to be fixed and, in fact, prob­a­bly can­not be fixed at any defen­si­ble cost to tax­pay­ers.” Citing the 2011 American Bar Association assess­ment of…

Read More

Mar 07, 2016

U.S. Supreme Court Grants New Trial to Louisiana Death Row Inmate

The U.S. Supreme Court issued a per curi­am deci­sion on March 7 grant­i­ng a new tri­al to Louisiana death row inmate Michael Wearry as a result of mul­ti­ple acts of mis­con­duct by pros­e­cu­tors in his case. No phys­i­cal evi­dence linked Wearry to the mur­der. His con­vic­tion was based large­ly on the tes­ti­mo­ny of an infor­mant, Sam Scott, who came for­ward two years after the crime with an account that did not match the details of the crime. Scott altered his sto­ry over the course of four…

Read More

Mar 04, 2016

Florida Legislature Passes Bill Requiring Agreement of 10 Jurors Before Judge May Impose Death Sentence

UPDATE: Gov. Rick Scott signed the bill into law on March 7. Previously: The Florida leg­is­la­ture passed a bill on March 3 to restruc­ture its death penal­ty statute in response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s rul­ing in Hurst v. Florida, which declared the state’s death penal­ty pro­ce­dures uncon­sti­tu­tion­al. The bill mod­i­fies Florida’s prac­tice of per­mit­ting judges to impose death sen­tences with­out the unan­i­mous agree­ment of jurors by requir­ing that at least…

Read More

Mar 03, 2016

Alabama Judge Rules Capital Sentencing Scheme Unconstitutional

Jefferson County, Alabama Circuit Judge Tracie Todd (pic­tured) ruled on March 3 that Alabama’s cap­i­tal sen­tenc­ing pro­ce­dure vio­lates the U.S. Constitution. Judge Todd barred the death penal­ty for four cap­i­tal mur­der defen­dants, say­ing that Alabama’s use of judi­cial over­ride vio­lates the Sixth…

Read More

Mar 02, 2016

Delaware Supreme Court to Consider Constitutionality of State’s Death Penalty Law

Delaware pub­lic defend­ers have filed a brief in the Delaware Supreme Court argu­ing that the state’s death sen­tenc­ing pro­ce­dures are uncon­sti­tu­tion­al. In their brief, the defend­ers describe mul­ti­ple con­sti­tu­tion­al prob­lems” that they say require Delaware’s death penal­ty scheme to be sub­stan­tial­ly restruc­tured.” These include sev­er­al pro­ce­dures that they say are uncon­sti­tu­tion­al under the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent 8 – 1 deci­sion in Hurst v. Florida.

Read More

Mar 01, 2016

NEW VOICES: Republican Former Death Penalty Supporter Leads Repeal Effort in Utah

Stephen Urquhart (pic­tured), a Republican state sen­a­tor in Utah, sup­port­ed the death penal­ty until about a year ago, when a friend con­vinced him that cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment did­n’t fit his con­ser­v­a­tive beliefs. Now Urquhart sees the death penal­ty as inef­fi­cient, cost­ly, and wrong and is the lead spon­sor of a bill to repeal the state’s death penal­ty. He said con­cerns about the cost of the death penal­ty and the risk of exe­cut­ing an inno­cent per­son changed his stance on the issue. In…

Read More

Feb 29, 2016

U.S. Supreme Court Hears Argument in Pennsylvania Judicial Bias Case

On February 29, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argu­ment in Williams v. Pennsylvania, a case chal­leng­ing for­mer Pennsylvania Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald Castille’s par­tic­i­pa­tion in the state’s appeal of a death penal­ty case involv­ing Terry Williams (pic­tured), whose cap­i­tal pros­e­cu­tion Castille per­son­al­ly autho­rized in his ear­li­er role as Philadelphia District Attorney. A low­er court judge over­turned Williams’ death sen­tence in 2012 find­ing that Philadelphia…

Read More