Publications & Testimony

Testimony and Statements on the Death Penalty

FROM DPIC

For testimony by former Executive Director Robert Dunham and former Executive Director Richard C. Dieter, please visit our page DPIC Testimony.

FROM RELIGIOUS LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS

FROM THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY

FROM ADVOCACY GROUPS

FROM JUDGES, LEGISLATORS, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS

FROM MURDER VICTIMS’ FAMILY MEMBERS

Items: 3331 — 3340


Mar 27, 2014

NEW VOICES: Former New Hampshire Justices Support Death Penalty Repeal

Two former justices of the New Hampshire Supreme Court recently voiced their support for repealing the death penalty. In an op-ed, Joseph Nadeau (l.) and John Broderick (r.) emphasized the death penalty’s lack of deterrent effect, saying, ​“New Hampshire has not executed anyone for three quarters of a century. Yet, it registered the second lowest murder rate in the nation every year of this century.” Murder rates were higher in heavy-use death penalty states, they noted. The former justices said…

Read More

Mar 26, 2014

Oklahoma Judge Finds Execution Secrecy Unconstitutional

On March 26, Oklahoma County District Judge Patricia Parrish held that the state’s lethal injection secrecy law violates the constitutional right to due process of inmates slated for execution. ​“I think that the secrecy statute is a violation of due process because access to the courts has been denied,” she said, saying the case was not ​“even a close call.” Death row inmates Clayton Lockett and Charles Warner challenged the law, which bans anyone from disclosing the source of the state’s…

Read More

Mar 25, 2014

Supreme Court to Review Death Penalty Case Involving Ineffective Representation

On March 24, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear arguments in Jennings v. Stephens (No. 13 – 7211), a Texas death penalty case involving ineffectiveness of counsel. In his request for federal relief from his death sentence, Robert Jennings cited three instances in which his trial lawyers failed to adequately represent him. A U.S. District Court granted him relief on two of those claims (including failure to present evidence of his mental problems), while denying the third (his own lawyers told…

Read More

Mar 24, 2014

BOOKS: Quest for Justice — Defending the Damned

In his book, ​“Quest for Justice: Defending the Damned,” Richard Jaffe explores the problems of the American death penalty system through his experience as a capital defense attorney in Alabama. During the past twenty years, Jaffe has helped secure the release of three death row inmates: Randall Padgett and Gary Drinkard, who were fully exonerated, and James Cochran, who was cleared of murder charges, but pleaded guilty to a related robbery charge. In his book, Jaffe wrote, ​“I always keep in…

Read More

Mar 21, 2014

EDITORIALS: Mississippi Paper Calls Pending Execution ​“Gravely Inhumane”

A recent editorial in the Jackson Free Press in Mississippi called for a halt to the scheduled execution of Michelle Byrom, saying she is ​“clearly not guilty of the crime for which the state plans to execute her next week.” The editorial noted that Byrom’s son had confessed to the crime four times.” He said the story he originally told sheriffs implicating his mother was made up because he was ​“scared, confused and high” when he was interrogated. The paper pointed to mitigating evidence about…

Read More

Mar 20, 2014

Doubts of Culpability Surround Upcoming Execution in Mississippi

Michelle Byrom is scheduled to be executed in Mississippi on March 27 for conspiring to murder her husband, Edward Byrom, Sr. Her son, Edward Byrom, Jr., known as Junior, confessed to the crime on multiple occasions, and wrote that he lied when he told police his mother and a friend were involved. ​“I was so scared, confused, and high, I just started spitting the first thought out, which turned in to this big conspiracy thing, for money, which was all BS, that’s why I had so many different…

Read More

Mar 19, 2014

COSTS: Idaho Study Finds Death Penalty Cases Are Rare, Lengthy, & Costly

A new, but limited, study of the costs of the death penalty in Idaho found that capital cases are more costly and take much more time to resolve than non-capital cases. One measure of death-penalty costs was reflected in the time spent by attorneys handling appeals. The State Appellate Public Defenders office spent about 44 times more time on a typical death penalty appeal than on a life sentence appeal (almost 8,000 hours per capital defendant compared to about 180 hours per non-death penalty…

Read More

Mar 18, 2014

Oklahoma Unable to Obtain Lethal Injection Drugs for Upcoming Executions

(UPDATE: The executions of Clayton Lockett and Charles Warner were stayed until April 22 and 29 respectively.) Oklahoma does not have the necessary drugs to carry out the upcoming executions of Clayton Lockett and Charles Warner, scheduled for March 20 and 26. According to a brief filed on behalf of the Department of Corrections, the department has made a ​“Herculean effort” to obtain pentobarbital and vecuronium bromide for the lethal injections, but still lacks a supply of either drug. The…

Read More

Mar 17, 2014

NEW VOICES: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice Criticizes Inadequate Representation in Capital Cases

In a lecture at the Widener University School of Law, Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice Thomas G. Saylor criticized the poor state of death penalty representation in Pennsylvania. He offered numerous cases in which death sentences were overturned because attorneys had failed to present mitigating evidence to the jury. Quoting from a special concurrence he wrote on a capital case involving ineffective assistance of counsel, he said, ​“Of greatest concern, these sorts of exceptionally costly…

Read More

Mar 14, 2014

Furman v. Georgia Reenactment Raises Questions of Arbitrariness

The Georgia State Bar’s constitutional symposium recently staged a reenactment of Furman v. Georgia, the U.S. Supreme Court case that led to the temporary suspension of the death penalty in 1972. Stephen Bright (pictured), president of the Southern Center for Human Rights, played the role of Anthony Amsterdam, who argued on behalf of death row inmates in two of the four cases that the Court decided in Furman. The roles of the justices were performed by Georgia Supreme Court Chief Justice Hugh…

Read More