Publications & Testimony

Items: 3481 — 3490


Dec 14, 2011

North Carolina Governor Upholds Racial Justice Act, Calling Bias Unacceptable”

North Carolina Governor Bev Perdue vetoed the bill that would have repealed the state’s Racial Justice Act that was passed in 2009. The Act allows death row inmates to appeal their death sen­tences based on sta­tis­ti­cal stud­ies show­ing racial bias. In issu­ing the veto, the gov­er­nor, who sup­ports the death penal­ty, said, I am veto­ing Senate Bill 9 for the same rea­son that I signed the Racial Justice Act two years ago: it is sim­ply unac­cept­able for racial prej­u­dice to play a…

Read More

Dec 13, 2011

Oklahoma Board Closely Split on First Execution for 2012

On December 5, the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board nar­row­ly vot­ed (3 – 2) to deny clemen­cy to death row inmate Gary Welch, the first per­son sched­uled to be exe­cut­ed in the coun­try in 2012. Welch was sen­tenced to death in 1996 for a mur­der that start­ed as a fight relat­ed to a drug deal. Welch said the vic­tim first stabbed him with a knife and he tried to defend him­self. To me, this was life or death. It was just luck that I sur­vived,” said Welch. My inten­tions were nev­er to…

Read More

Dec 12, 2011

NEW VOICES: Former Texas Governor Supports Actions by Oregon’s Governor

In a recent op-ed in Oregon’s Statesman Journal, for­mer Texas Governor Mark White (pic­tured) applaud­ed Oregon Governor John Kitzhabers deci­sion to grant a reprieve to death row inmate Gary Haugen and to halt all exe­cu­tions in the state. Governor White wrote, I think Kitzhaber’s deci­sion is respectable and coura­geous. In Oregon, as in Texas, it is clear­ly with­in the con­sti­tu­tion­al author­i­ty of the gov­er­nor to grant reprieves and com­mu­ta­tions. With…

Read More

Dec 09, 2011

BOOKS: Deathquest: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Capital Punishment in the United States”

The fourth edi­tion of Robert Bohm’s Deathquest: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Capital Punishment in the United States,” is now avail­able through Anderson Publishing. The new edi­tion is updat­ed with dis­cus­sion of the lat­est research on the effec­tive­ness of the death penal­ty, the poten­tial for dis­crim­i­na­to­ry appli­ca­tion, costs, and new data on mis­car­riages of jus­tice, pub­lic opin­ion, and the influ­ences of reli­gion. This text­book includes two new chap­ters on…

Read More

Dec 07, 2011

STUDIES: American Bar Association Releases Assessement of Kentucky’s Death Penalty

On December 7, the American Bar Association released a report assess­ing Kentuckys sys­tem of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment and call­ing for a halt to exe­cu­tions in the state. The report was pre­pared by the Kentucky Assessment Team on the Death Penalty, which includ­ed law pro­fes­sors, for­mer state supreme court jus­tices, and prac­tic­ing attor­neys. The two-year study rec­om­mend­ed that the state tem­porar­i­ly sus­pend exe­cu­tions until seri­ous issues of fair­ness and accu­ra­cy are…

Read More

Dec 06, 2011

STUDIES: Virginia Leads the Country in Death Sentences Resulting in Executions

According to a recent study by the Richmond Times-Dispatch, Virginia exe­cutes the high­est pro­por­tion of peo­ple sen­tenced to death of any state in the coun­try. Of the 149 death sen­tences hand­ed down through 2010, 108 have result­ed in an exe­cu­tion, a rate of about 72 per­cent. Virginia is sec­ond to Texas in the total num­ber of exe­cu­tions car­ried out since 1976, but Texas has exe­cut­ed less than half of those sen­tenced to death. In many states, less than 1 in 10 death…

Read More

Dec 05, 2011

STUDIES: Eyewitness Identification Comes Under Supreme Court and Scientific Scrutiny

The U.S. Supreme Court recent­ly con­sid­ered Perry v. New Hampshire, a case ques­tion­ing the valid­i­ty of eye­wit­ness tes­ti­mo­ny when the iden­ti­fi­ca­tion was made under unre­li­able cir­cum­stances. At the same time, years of sci­en­tif­ic study on the accu­ra­cy of human mem­o­ry are point­ing to the need for reform in the use of eye­wit­ness evi­dence in crim­i­nal cas­es. Barbara Tversky, a psy­chol­o­gy pro­fes­sor at Columbia University, whose exper­i­ments on…

Read More

Dec 02, 2011

NEW RESOURCES: DPIC’s Latest Podcast Explores the Impact of International Law and Opinion on the U.S. Death Penalty

The lat­est edi­tion of the Death Penalty Information Center’s series of pod­casts, DPIC on the Issues, is now avail­able for lis­ten­ing or down­load­ing. This pod­cast — the 17th in the series — dis­cuss­es inter­na­tion­al views on the death penal­ty and how those views might affect cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment in the United States. The pod­cast includes dis­cus­sions about the role of inter­na­tion­al phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal com­pa­nies in lethal injec­tions being car­ried out in the United States,…

Read More

Dec 01, 2011

EDITORIALS: An Intolerable Burden of Proof”

An edi­to­r­i­al in the New York Times crit­i­cized a recent rul­ing by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, uphold­ing the heavy bur­den Georgia places on offend­ers with intel­lec­tu­al dis­abil­i­ties. In order to be exempt from the death penal­ty, defen­dants must prove beyond a rea­son­able doubt” that they are men­tal­ly retard­ed. The U.S. Supreme Court held in 2002 that such defen­dants can­not receive the death penal­ty, but the Court…

Read More