Publications & Testimony

Items: 3721 — 3730


May 26, 2011

Update on Lethal Injection Issue

In a clear nation­al trend, sev­en states (Alabama, Arizona, Mississippi, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, and South Carolina) have used pen­to­bar­bi­tal instead of sodi­um thiopen­tal in their exe­cu­tions in 2011. The most recent such exe­cu­tion was that of Donald Beaty in Arizona on May 25, fol­low­ing a tem­po­rary stay as the state made a sud­den switch to the new drug. Ohio is the only one of the sev­en states to use…

Read More

May 25, 2011

LETHAL INJECTION: Justice Dept. Orders Arizona Not to Use Imported Drug, Staying Execution

The Arizona Supreme Court stayed the exe­cu­tion of Donald Beaty that was sched­uled for May 25 after the state Department of Corrections tried to make last-minute changes to the exe­cu­tion pro­to­col. On May 24 the U.S. Department of Justice told Arizona not to use its sup­ply of sodi­um thiopen­tal because it had been obtained ille­gal­ly from a com­pa­ny in Great Britain. Arizona’s Attorney General filed notice with the Arizona Supreme Court stat­ing that, to avoid…

Read More

May 24, 2011

NEW VOICES: Mother of Murder Victim Urges Connecticut Legislators to Repeal Death Penalty

Victoria Coward, whose son Tyler (pic­tured) was killed when he was 18, recent­ly peti­tioned Connecticut leg­is­la­tors to repeal the death penal­ty. Speaking of her son’s killer, Coward said, In the begin­ning I was so mad, I did want him dead. Then I had to think about it. You don’t want any­one killing your son. Just get him off the street so he doesn’t do that to any­body else. Killing Jose [her son’s mur­der­er] isn’t going to help me… What…

Read More

May 23, 2011

EDITORIALS: Philadelphia Inquirer — Juries Know Better”

A recent edi­to­r­i­al in the Philadelphia Inquirer con­cludes the pub­lic is ready to scrap the death penal­ty in Pennsylvania, even if the leg­is­la­ture is not. According to the edi­to­r­i­al, juries opt­ed for the death penal­ty in just 3% of first-degree mur­der cas­es over the past four years: Pennsylvania juries clear­ly are more com­fort­able with the alter­na­tive sen­tence of life with­out parole, which assures that first-degree mur­der con­victs will waste away…

Read More

May 20, 2011

STUDIES: Jurors May Be Allowing Intellectually Disabled Defendants to be Executed

Although the U.S. Supreme Court has deter­mined that the intel­lec­tu­al­ly dis­abiled (men­tal­ly retard­ed) are barred from the death penal­ty, the deci­sion of whether a defen­dant meets this dis­abil­i­ty stan­dard is not made by men­tal health experts but by jurors and judges. A recent study pub­lished in Law & Psychology Review found that jurors expect a much low­er lev­el of intel­lec­tu­al func­tion­ing than men­tal health experts to arrive at a find­ing of dis­abil­i­ty. Moreover,…

Read More

May 19, 2011

NEW VOICES: Current and Former California Law Enforcement Officials Question Future of Death Penalty

Current and for­mer law enforce­ment offi­cials in California recent­ly dis­cussed their views on the future of the death penal­ty dur­ing a con­fer­ence in San Francisco. Jeanne Woodford (pic­tured left), for­mer Warden of San Quentin prison, said that the time has come to end exe­cu­tions in the United States: I have had the oppor­tu­ni­ty to view this issue from every point of view. I absolute­ly am pas­sion­ate about the posi­tion that it’s time to end the death penal­ty in…

Read More

May 18, 2011

BOOKS: Former Wall St. Lawyer Now Focuses on Death Row Inmates

Dale Recinella for­mer­ly worked as an attor­ney on large finan­cial deals, includ­ing the build­ing of a National Football League sta­di­um. He also sup­port­ed the death penal­ty. But he now focus­es on the needs of death row inmates and oth­er pris­on­ers in Florida. His new book, enti­tled Now I Walk on Death Row,” tells of his career tran­si­tion and the rever­sal in his views on cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment. Although he attrib­ut­es his changes to his…

Read More

May 17, 2011

ARBITRARINESS: Pennsylvania’s Death Penalty Mostly Means Life

A recent Philadelphia Inquirer study revealed that the death penal­ty is almost nev­er hand­ed down for homi­cides in Pennsylvania, and that exe­cu­tions are even more unlike­ly. From a com­pi­la­tion of 1,975 homi­cide cas­es dat­ing from 2007 to Feb. 3, 2011 pro­vid­ed by the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts, only 8 result­ed in a death sen­tence. Almost all cas­es end­ed with a sen­tence of life with­out parole, with guilty pleas, acquit­tals or dis­missal of charges. Of the…

Read More

May 16, 2011

Two Cases of Probable Innocence Illustrate Need for Better System of Review

Attorneys for a mur­der defen­dant who may be inno­cent have called for reforms in the sys­tem of fed­er­al review, and par­tic­u­lar­ly to the accu­mu­lat­ed bar­ri­ers to habeas cor­pus review of claims of fac­tu­al inno­cence.” Barry Scheck of the Innocence Project, along with attor­neys for Dr. Jeffrey R. MacDonald in North Carolina, point­ed to the mount­ing evi­dence of MacDonald’s pos­si­ble inno­cence that was dis­missed by the fed­er­al courts until DNA evi­dence final­ly became available:…

Read More

May 13, 2011

Sole Provider of New Drug for U.S. Executions Faces Ethical Dilemma

Lundbeck Inc., a Danish phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal com­pa­ny that is the sole man­u­fac­tur­er of pen­to­bar­bi­tal for sale in the U.S., is fac­ing an eth­i­cal dilem­ma regard­ing the use of its drug in exe­cu­tions. Pentobarbital is increas­ing­ly being used in the U.S. in place of sodi­um thiopen­tal for lethal injec­tions. Pentobarbital was most recent­ly used in exe­cu­tions in Texas, South Carolina, and Mississippi. Andrew Schroll, a spokesman for Lundbeck, said that the com­pa­ny has…

Read More