An Oregon appel­late court has grant­ed a new tri­al to death-row pris­on­er Jesse Johnson, find­ing his tri­al coun­sel inef­fec­tive for fail­ing to inter­view a neigh­bor of the homi­cide vic­tim whose eye­wit­ness tes­ti­mo­ny could poten­tial­ly exon­er­ate him of the murder.

On October 6, 2021, a unan­i­mous three-judge pan­el of the Oregon Court of Appeals ruled that Johnson’s tri­al lawyers defi­cient­ly inves­ti­gat­ed the mur­der, fail­ing to speak with Patricia Hubbard, a neigh­bor who lived direct­ly across the street from the vic­tim, Harriet Thompson. Hubbard, the court said, heard and saw events that con­tra­dict­ed the prosecution’s ver­sion of Thompson’s mur­der and exposed racial bias in the Salem police’s inves­ti­ga­tion of the killing. The court also found that tri­al coun­sel had unrea­son­ably failed to speak with anoth­er neigh­bor who had alert­ed police — and lat­er Johnson’s post-con­vic­tion inves­ti­ga­tors — that Hubbard had impor­tant infor­ma­tion about the murder. 

Hubbard, who worked late at night, told Johnson’s appeal lawyers that she had been sit­ting on her porch at 3:45 a.m. on the night of the mur­der. At that time, she said, she saw a white man whom she rec­og­nized as a fre­quent vis­i­tor of the vic­tim park his van in the victim’s dri­ve­way and go inside. Seconds lat­er,” the court wrote, Hubbard heard scream­ing com­ing from [the victim’s] house, a thud and then silence” and then saw the white man exit the back door, leap off the back steps, and run fly­ing” away from the house. About a half-hour lat­er, she saw a Black man, whom she lat­er said did not look like Johnson, walk­ing down the victim’s dri­ve­way. Hubbard was at work when the victim’s body was dis­cov­ered, and her neigh­bor lat­er brought a Salem police detec­tive to Hubbard’s house to assist in the inves­ti­ga­tion. According to Hubbard, the detec­tive refused to take a state­ment from her, telling her, A n***r got mur­dered, and a n***r’s going to pay for it.” 

The court wrote, “[a] rea­son­able inves­ti­ga­tion would like­ly have led to find­ing and inter­view­ing Hubbard, which in turn would have led to evi­dence and tes­ti­mo­ny that could have tend­ed to affect the out­come of the trial.” 

This was a case where there were a series of mis­takes that led to this injus­tice,” Johnson’s post-con­vic­tion lawyer, Ryan O’Connor, told Oregon Public Broadcasting. Systemically, it’s a recog­ni­tion of the way police mis­con­duct and racism cause wrong­ful con­vic­tions and injus­tice.” Marion County pros­e­cu­tors have 35 days to decide whether to appeal the rul­ing to the Oregon Supreme Court. If they do not, they must decide whether to retry Johnson for the murder. 

Sources

Conrad Wilson, New tri­al ordered for man who has spent 17 years on Oregon’s death row, Oregon Public Broadcasting, October 6, 2021; Andrew Selsky, Court revers­es man’s mur­der con­vic­tion, death sen­tence, Associated Press, October 62021.

Read the Oregon Court of Appeals rul­ing in Johnson v. Premo.