Thomas Creech and wife LeAnn Creech

Photo cour­tesy of attor­ney Jonah Horwitz. 

Thomas Creech’s February 28 exe­cu­tion was halt­ed after the Idaho Department of Correction exe­cu­tion team was unable to set an intra­venous line after an hour of repeat­ed attempts. Mr. Creech remained strapped to the gur­ney and con­scious while unsuc­cess­ful attempts were made to access veins in both arms and legs. Officials did not dis­close why the exe­cu­tion team was unable to estab­lish an IV line, but the train­ing and qual­i­fi­ca­tions of staff, as well as the acces­si­bil­i­ty and qual­i­ty of Mr. Creech’s veins, could have been fac­tors. Mr. Creech’s attor­neys pre­vi­ous­ly stat­ed that he suf­fers from Type 2 dia­betes, hyper­ten­sion, and ede­ma, which could impact cir­cu­la­tion and vein qual­i­ty. An attempt to set a sec­ond exe­cu­tion date for Mr. Creech would raise con­cerns like those raised by Kenneth Smith before he was exe­cut­ed in Alabama in January. Mr. Smith also sur­vived an ini­tial exe­cu­tion attempt and argued that sub­ject­ing him to a sec­ond attempt would be uncon­sti­tu­tion­al. While the United States Supreme Court did not agree to rule on his claim, inter­na­tion­al experts and human rights bod­ies expressed con­cern and alarm at the sec­ond exe­cu­tion attempt, char­ac­ter­iz­ing it as tor­ture. Another Idaho death-sen­tenced pris­on­er, Gerald Pizzuto, received a stay of exe­cu­tion in August 2023 while the court con­sid­ered his claim that the state vio­lates his Constitutional right against cru­el and unusu­al pun­ish­ment by repeat­ed­ly sched­ul­ing exe­cu­tion dates while know­ing the state does not have the means to car­ry it out.

Josh Tewalt, Director of the Idaho Department of Correction, told press at a news con­fer­ence fol­low­ing the exe­cu­tion attempt that the exe­cu­tion team’s efforts to estab­lish an IV line were con­sis­tent with IDOC pol­i­cy.” The state’s exe­cu­tion team, which con­sists entire­ly of vol­un­teers, is required by pro­to­col to have at least three years of med­ical expe­ri­ence. The iden­ti­ties, skills, and spe­cif­ic qual­i­fi­ca­tions of the indi­vid­u­als on the med­ical team are pro­tect­ed from dis­clo­sure by a March 2022 secre­cy law, which also con­ceals from the pub­lic and the courts infor­ma­tion on the pro­duc­ers and sup­pli­ers of drugs used in Idaho exe­cu­tions. It is unknown whether the secre­cy law will pre­vent any pub­lic report describ­ing what went wrong in Mr. Creech’s executions.

Mr. Creech’s death war­rant required his exe­cu­tion be car­ried out by 11:59pm on February 28, 2024. After the fail­ure to exe­cute Mr. Creech in the morn­ing, his attor­neys filed a new request for a stay in fed­er­al court, say­ing that Idaho’s bad­ly botched exe­cu­tion attempt” proves the state’s inabil­i­ty to car­ry out a humane and con­sti­tu­tion­al exe­cu­tion.” In a state­ment fol­low­ing the botched exe­cu­tion attempt, The Federal Defender Services of Idaho (FDSI) said that they are angered but not sur­prised that the State of Idaho botched” Mr. Creech’s exe­cu­tion. This is what hap­pens when unknown indi­vid­u­als with unknown train­ing are assigned to car­ry out an execution…This is pre­cise­ly the kind of mishap we warned the State and the Courts could hap­pen when attempt­ing to exe­cute one of the country’s old­est death-row inmates in cir­cum­stances com­plete­ly shield­ed in secre­cy despite a well-known his­to­ry of get­ting drugs from shady sources,” FDSI added.

Mr. Tewalt told the press that the Idaho Department of Corrections does not have an idea of time frame or next steps at this point.” Mr. Creech’s pre­vi­ous­ly filed peti­tions with the United States Supreme Court were denied. Mr. Creech has iden­ti­fied a sub­stan­tial need for guid­ance from the Court on an issue of great nation­al impor­tance and he has brought a strong vehi­cle for it to do,” Mr. Creech’s attor­neys wrote in the most recent petition. 

In the last decade, an increas­ing num­ber of phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal com­pa­nies have restrict­ed the sales of their drugs to pris­ons, mak­ing it dif­fi­cult for some states to access ade­quate drugs for lethal injec­tion. Prior to Idaho’s last exe­cu­tion in 2012, Mr. Tewalt, not yet the Director of IDOC, and a col­league flew to neigh­bor­ing Washington state with more than $10,000 to buy drugs for use in an exe­cu­tion from a phar­ma­cist. This trip only became pub­lic knowl­edge after University of Idaho pro­fes­sor Aliza Cover suc­cess­ful­ly won a law­suit seek­ing the infor­ma­tion under the state’s pub­lic records act. In March 2023, Gov. Brad Little also signed leg­is­la­tion autho­riz­ing the fir­ing squad as a method of exe­cu­tion. This law gives the Director of IDOC up to five days after a death war­rant is issued to deter­mine if lethal injec­tion is avail­able. As of February 2024, the state has made lit­tle progress in devel­op­ing a facil­i­ty suit­able for the fir­ing squad, pre­clud­ing the state from using this method of exe­cu­tion in the near future.

Citation Guide
Sources

Rebecca Boone, Things to know about Idaho’s botched exe­cu­tion of ser­i­al killer Thomas Eugene Creech, Associated Press, February 28, 2024; Bill Hutchinson, Death cham­ber glitch halts exe­cu­tion of ser­i­al killer Thomas Creech, ABC News, February 282024.

Statement from the Federal Defender Services of Idaho can be found, here.