Publications & Testimony

Testimony and Statements on the Death Penalty

FROM DPIC

For testimony by former Executive Director Robert Dunham and former Executive Director Richard C. Dieter, please visit our page DPIC Testimony.

FROM RELIGIOUS LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS

FROM THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY

FROM ADVOCACY GROUPS

FROM JUDGES, LEGISLATORS, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS

FROM MURDER VICTIMS’ FAMILY MEMBERS

Items: 201 — 210


Oct 01, 2025

North Carolina Legislature Passes Sweeping Criminal Law Legislation in Effort to Restart Executions

On September 23, 2025, North Carolina lawmakers approved and forwarded to Governor Josh Stein for signature House Bill 307 — also known as “Iryna’s Law” — which proposes sweeping changes to the state’s criminal laws. HB 307 imposes stricter pretrial release conditions, requires involuntary mental health evaluations for defendants under certain circumstances, shortens the timeline for capital case appeals, and provides an alternative to the current method of execution — lethal injection. North…

Read More

Sep 30, 2025

DPI Podcast 12:01 The Death Penalty in Context: Katherine Judson of the Center for Integrity in Forensic Sciences Speaks on Flawed Forensics and Robert Roberson

In the September 2025 episode of 12:01: The Death Penalty in Context, DPI’s managing director Anne Holsinger interviews Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS) expert Katherine Judson. Ms. Judson is Executive Director of the Center for Integrity in Forensic Sciences and former Shaken Baby Syndrome/Abusive Head Trauma Litigation Coordinator for the Wisconsin Innocence Project. In the episode, Ms. Judson provides the history behind Shaken Baby Syndrome, and why it is now known by experts as “junk science.”

Read More

Sep 29, 2025

Counsel Seeks to Challenge Rare Execution of 72-Year-Old Florida Prisoner on Constitutional Grounds in Florida Supreme Court

With just weeks remaining before his scheduled execution, attorneys for 72-year-old Samuel Lee Smithers are appealing the dismissal of their motion filed September 19, 2025, arguing that executing an elderly person violates both Florida and the U.S. Constitutions’ prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment and fails to meet any valid penological justification. On September 22, 2025, the Hillsborough County Circuit Court denied Mr. Smithers’ request for an evidentiary hearing to consider…

Read More

Sep 25, 2025

Iran Hits 1000 Execution Mark, Highest Total in Three Decades

Norway-based Iran Human Rights (IHRNGO) has reported that at least 1000 people have been executed in Iran between January 1 and September 23, 2025 — a thirty year high. This is the fifth consecutive year that Iran has experienced an increase in executions, with the biggest year-over-year increase (43%) occurring in 2023, in the aftermath of the “Women, Life, Freedom” nationwide protests. Most executions continue to be carried out for offenses that do not meet the international legal threshold…

Read More

Sep 24, 2025

Mangione’s Counsel Challenge Constitutionality of Federal Death Penalty as Arbitrary

In a motion filed September 20, 2025, attorneys for Luigi Mangione, indicted in the 2024 killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, have filed a broad challenge to the constitutionality of the federal death penalty, arguing that it is applied arbitrarily, in violation of Fifth Amendment’s due process protections and the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishments. They are asking the United States District Court in the Southern District of New York to dismiss the…

Read More

Sep 23, 2025

New Book of Interest: SHAKEN: The Rush to Execute an Innocent Man by John Grisham

Acclaimed novelist and former criminal defense lawyer John Grisham is set to release a new book titled SHAKEN: The Rush to Execute an Innocent Man on June 9th, 2026. The book is a non-fiction account of the contentious case of Robert Roberson, the Texas man who has been on death row for over twenty years and is now facing execution in Texas in October 2025, despite strong evidence of his innocence. “Robert Roberson is innocent because the evidence developed in recent proceedings, but so far…

Read More

Sep 22, 2025

Victims’ Families in Kirk and Berry Cases Cite Religious Reasons for Opposition to the Death Penalty

Murder victims’ family members hold a wide range of views about what justice means. For some, the death penalty holds the promise of closure, while for others, it is a source of continued trauma and uncertainty. In two recent cases, victims’ family members have publicly expressed their opposition to the death penalty, citing their religious views and need to forgive. Will Berry was just 11 years old when Geoffrey West shot and killed his mother, Margaret Parrish Berry, during a gas station…

Read More

Sep 18, 2025

Spotlight on Utah’s Death Penalty

The capital charges filed against Tyler Robinson, the man accused of killing conservative political activist Charlie Kirk on September 10th, have drawn new attention to Utah’s death penalty. Although Utah was among the first states to reinstate the death penalty after it was invalidated by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1972, and the first to perform an execution in the modern era, executions have been rare over the last 50 years. Just eight people have been executed in Utah since 1977. In 2024, the…

Read More

Sep 17, 2025

Autopsy Points to Reason Behind Byron Black’s Painful Execution in Tennessee

Byron Black was executed in Tennessee by lethal injection on August 5, 2025. During his execution, Mr. Black unexpectedly and repeatedly groaned over the course of several minutes and audibly told his spiritual advisor that he was in pain. An autopsy released September 10, 2025, provides some explanation. It found evidence of “pulmonary congestion and edema”– defined as an abnormal buildup of fluid in the lungs which can produce sensations of “doom, panic, drowning, and asphyxiation” according…

Read More

Sep 16, 2025

Two Scheduled Executions of People with Intellectual Disability in Florida Raise Serious Concerns

The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2002 decision in Atkins v. Virginia established that the Eighth Amendment prohibits executing people with intellectual disability. The Court later clarified that rigid IQ cutoffs were not permissible and also required states to consider meaningful evidence of intellectual disability, including scientifically valid expert testimony and adaptive functioning deficits. Despite this unequivocal constitutional protection, two death-sentenced prisoners — David Pittman and Victor…

Read More