New York Times

By MARC LACEY and RAYMOND BONNER

Saying she was sore­ly trou­bled” by stark racial dis­par­i­ties in the fed­er­al death penal­ty, Attorney General Janet Reno today ordered United States attor­neys to help explain why cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment is not applied uni­form­ly across ethnic groups.

We must ensure that all defen­dants who come into our sys­tem are treat­ed in a fair and just man­ner,” Ms. Reno said in announc­ing the results of a sur­vey that showed three-quar­ters of the defen­dants con­sid­ered for the fed­er­al death penal­ty were mem­bers of minori­ties. We must do all we can in the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment to root out bias at every step.”

Ms. Reno said the data com­piled by the Justice Department raised no ques­tions about the inno­cence of defen­dants and there­fore did not mer­it a mora­to­ri­um on the death penal­ty. But crit­ics seized on the data to but­tress their calls for an imme­di­ate halt to fed­er­al exe­cu­tions, the last of which was in 1963.

Just as we feared, the same seri­ous flaws in the admin­is­tra­tion of the death penal­ty that have plagued the states also afflict the fed­er­al death penal­ty,” said Senator Russell D. Feingold, Democrat of Wisconsin. Let’s tem­porar­i­ly sus­pend fed­er­al exe­cu­tions and let a thought­ful­ly cho­sen com­mis­sion exam­ine the sys­tem. American ideals of jus­tice demand that much.”
An aide to Mr. Feingold said the sen­a­tor would intro­duce leg­is­la­tion this week call­ing for such a moratorium.

This is the worst sort of racial pro­fil­ing with the worst result,” said Julian Bond, the chair­man of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. This argues strong­ly for a fed­er­al mora­to­ri­um until there can be assur­ances this can be applied fairly.”

A White House spokesman, Jake Siewert, said the study required followup.

We’ve seen the num­bers,” Mr. Siewert said. At first glance, those num­bers are trou­bling. We need to know more about exact­ly what’s behind the numbers.”

The sta­tis­ti­cal sur­vey exam­ined the eth­nic­i­ty of the defen­dants in 713 cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment cas­es since the fed­er­al death penal­ty was rein­stat­ed in 1988.

Since 1995, when a for­mal review process was put in place, 80 per­cent of the 682 defen­dants who faced cap­i­tal charges were mem­bers of minori­ties. United States attor­neys rec­om­mend­ed the death penal­ty for 183 defen­dants, 74 per­cent of whom were mem­bers of minorities.

I can’t help but be both per­son­al­ly and pro­fes­sion­al­ly dis­turbed by the num­bers that we dis­cuss today,” Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder said. To be sure, many fac­tors have led to the dis­pro­por­tion­ate rep­re­sen­ta­tion of racial and eth­nic minori­ties through­out the fed­er­al death penal­ty process. Nevertheless, no one read­ing this report can help but be dis­turbed, trou­bled, by this disparity.”

States exe­cut­ed 4,400 peo­ple from 1930 to 1999, accord­ing to the Justice Department, com­pared with 33 fed­er­al exe­cu­tions since 1930.

As of the end of 1998, there were 3,433 peo­ple with death sen­tences in the states, com­pared with 19 peo­ple with pend­ing fed­er­al exe­cu­tions, the study said.

Legislation approved by Congress in 1994 and 1996 added more than 40 new offens­es to the list of capital crimes.

Ms. Reno imposed a tighter review of death cas­es in 1995, requir­ing United States attor­neys to sub­mit to the Justice Department’s head­quar­ters all cas­es for which the death penal­ty is an option. Capital pun­ish­ment can be pur­sued only with the approval of Ms. Reno and a pan­el of senior offi­cials. The data released today, how­ev­er, showed that defen­dants from minori­ties make up the bulk of those cas­es that appear on Ms. Reno’s desk.

Ms. Reno said an even broad­er study was required to deter­mine whether bias” played a role in the sys­tem. She called for a study of the prob­lem by out­side experts, and said Mr. Holder would lead a review of homi­cide cas­es han­dled by states ver­sus those han­dled by the federal government.

The oth­er find­ings in the study included these:

  • United States attor­neys in 49 of the coun­try’s 94 judi­cial dis­tricts sub­mit­ted cas­es that were eli­gi­ble for the death penal­ty to the Justice Department since 1995. Ten of the 49 dis­tricts sub­mit­ted rec­om­men­da­tions in favor of the death penal­ty. About 40 per­cent of the 682 death-penal­ty cas­es sub­mit­ted for review came from five of the United States attorney districts.
  • The vic­tims of those who faced the prospect of the fed­er­al death penal­ty were more like­ly to be black than white. Of the 894 vic­tims involved in cas­es where the death penal­ty was con­sid­ered, 53 per­cent were black, 31 per­cent were white, 13 per­cent were Hispanic and 3 per­cent were other groups.
  • Blacks were more like­ly to face the death penal­ty for inter­ra­cial homi­cides than whites. Of the 177 defen­dants who faced the death penal­ty for killing a vic­tim of anoth­er race since 1955, 55 per­cent were black, 25 per­cent were Hispanic, 11 per­cent were white and 8 per­cent were other.

David Bruck of the Federal Death Penalty Resource Counsel Project, a fed­er­al­ly fund­ed pro­gram to assist court-appoint­ed lawyers in fed­er­al death penal­ty cas­es, praised Ms. Reno for col­lect­ing the facts but said the sys­tem was clear­ly flawed.
No state in America, not Mississippi, not Texas, not South Carolina, has pro­duced such a racial­ly lop-sided death sen­tenc­ing record as has the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment,” Mr. Bruck said. It’s obvi­ous that the time for a mora­to­ri­um on the fed­er­al death penal­ty has arrived.”

GRAPHIC: Chart: Disparities in Federal Death Penalty”
A study by the Justice Department found wide racial and geo­graph­ic dis­par­i­ties in the num­ber of death penal­ty cas­es that U.S. attor­neys sub­mit­ted to the attor­ney gen­er­al for review since 1995, and how often the U.S. attor­ney rec­om­mend­ed the death penal­ty in those cas­es. [see DPIC’s sum­ma­ry of the report]

Map shows the num­ber of death penal­ty cas­es sub­mit­ted for review, by state.