DPI Reports
Below are reports released by the Death Penalty Information Center since its inception, covering subjects such as race, innocence, politicization, costs of the death penalty, and more. When opening a report, please allow the report page to load fully before selecting links to sections or footnotes. Most of these reports are also available in printed form from DPIC. For a copy of one of these reports, e‑mail DPI. For bulk orders, please download our Resource Order Form.
Reports are separated into Year End Reports, In-Depth Reports, and Special Reports. In-Depth Reports are DPI’s signature long, thorough reports on major death-penalty issues. These include “The 2% Death Penalty,” examining geographic arbitrariness in capital punishment, and “Behind the Curtain,” covering secrecy in the death penalty system. Special Reports are shorter, and typically address a specific event or question. These include DPI’s explanation of the 2017 spate of executions that were scheduled in Arkansas, and our analysis of the largest number of executions performed on a single day.
Reports: 71 — 75
Mar 01, 1994
Racial Disparities in Federal Death Penalty Prosecutions 1988 – 1994
– Former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Harry A. Blackmun, Feb. 22, 1994…
Read MoreDec 31, 1993
Innocence and the Death Penalty: Assessing the Danger of Mistaken Executions
In 1972, when the Supreme Court ruled in Furman v. Georgia that the death penalty as then applied was arbitrary and capricious and therefore unconstitutional, a majority of the Justices expected that the adoption of narrowly crafted sentencing procedures would protect against innocent persons being sentenced to death. Yet the promise of Furman has not been fulfilled: innocent persons are still being sentenced to death, and the chances are high that…
Read MoreApr 01, 1993
Sentencing for Life: Americans Embrace Alternatives to the Death Penalty
– Late Judge Charles Weltner, Georgia Supreme Court…
Read MoreMay 01, 1992
Justice on the Cheap: The Philadelphia Story
“Them without the capital get the punishment” is a well-worn phrase among those who have studied the unequal application of the death penalty in America. Poor people facing society’s ultimate penalty must rely on public funds to ensure they are competently represented, as the Constitution guarantees. Yet, in more and more jurisdictions, public services of all kinds are being slashed for lack of adequate funding. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, is one such…
Read MoreMar 01, 1992
Killing Justice: Government Misconduct and the Death Penalty
–Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78…
Read More



