DPIC Reports

Below are reports released by the Death Penalty Information Center since its incep­tion, cov­er­ing sub­jects such as race, inno­cence, politi­ciza­tion, costs of the death penal­ty, and more. When open­ing a report, please allow the report page to load ful­ly before select­ing links to sec­tions or foot­notes. Most of these reports are also avail­able in print­ed form from DPIC. For a copy of one of these reports, e‑mail DPIC. For bulk orders, please down­load our Resource Order Form.

Reports are sep­a­rat­ed into Year End Reports, In-Depth Reports, and Special Reports. In-Depth Reports are DPIC’s sig­na­ture long, thor­ough reports on major death-penal­ty issues. These include The 2% Death Penalty,” exam­in­ing geo­graph­ic arbi­trari­ness in cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment, and Behind the Curtain,” cov­er­ing secre­cy in the death penal­ty sys­tem. Special Reports are short­er, and typ­i­cal­ly address a spe­cif­ic event or ques­tion. These include DPIC’s expla­na­tion of the 2017 spate of exe­cu­tions that were sched­uled in Arkansas, and our analy­sis of the largest num­ber of exe­cu­tions per­formed on a sin­gle day.

Reports: 61 — 65


Feb 01, 1995

On the Front Line: Law Enforcement Views on the Death Penalty

A new nation­al sur­vey of police chiefs from around the coun­try dis­cred­its the repeat­ed asser­tion that the death penal­ty is an impor­tant law enforce­ment tool. While politi­cians have extolled the impor­tance of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment in fight­ing crime, they have failed to assess the actu­al pri­or­i­ties of those in law enforce­ment and have sad­dled the tax­pay­ers with an enor­mous­ly cost­ly death penal­ty at the expense of more effec­tive crime fight­ing strategies.

Read More

Nov 01, 1994

Millions Misspent: What Politicians Don’t Say About the High Costs of the Death Penalty

Across the coun­try, police are being laid off, pris­on­ers are being released ear­ly, the courts are clogged, and crime con­tin­ues to rise. The eco­nom­ic reces­sion has caused cut­backs in the back­bone of the crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem. In Florida, the bud­get cri­sis result­ed in the ear­ly release of 3,000 pris­on­ers. In Texas, pris­on­ers are serv­ing only 20% of their time and rear­rests are com­mon. Georgia is lay­ing off 900 cor­rec­tion­al per­son­nel and New Jersey has had to dis­miss 500 police offi­cers. Yet these same states, and many oth­ers like them, are…

Read More

May 01, 1994

The Future of the Death Penalty in the U.S.: A Texas-Sized Crisis

Texas is the nation’s fore­most exe­cu­tion­er. It has been respon­si­ble for a third of the exe­cu­tions in the coun­try and has car­ried out two and a half times as many death sen­tences as the next lead­ing state. Death war­rants are being signed at an unman­age­able pace, yet the Texas death row is bulging with unprece­dent­ed num­bers of inmates. But this accel­er­at­ed form of jus­tice comes at a price. The rest of the coun­try should heed the warn­ing of the Texas expe­ri­ence before it embarks on a whole­sale expan­sion of the…

Read More

Mar 01, 1994

Racial Disparities in Federal Death Penalty Prosecutions 1988 – 1994

Racial minori­ties are being pros­e­cut­ed under fed­er­al death penal­ty law far beyond their pro­por­tion in the gen­er­al pop­u­la­tion or the pop­u­la­tion of crim­i­nal offend­ers. Analysis of pros­e­cu­tions under the fed­er­al death penal­ty pro­vi­sions of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 [2] reveals that 89% of the defen­dants select­ed for cap­i­tal pros­e­cu­tion have been either African-American or Mexican-American. Moreover, the num­ber of pros­e­cu­tions under this Act has been increas­ing over the past two years with no decline in the racial dis­par­i­ties. All ten of the recent­ly approved fed­er­al cap­i­tal pros­e­cu­tions have…

Read More

Dec 31, 1993

Innocence and the Death Penalty: Assessing the Danger of Mistaken Executions

In 1972, when the Supreme Court ruled in Furman v. Georgia that the death penal­ty as then applied was arbi­trary and capri­cious and there­fore uncon­sti­tu­tion­al, a major­i­ty of the Justices expect­ed that the adop­tion of nar­row­ly craft­ed sen­tenc­ing pro­ce­dures would pro­tect against inno­cent per­sons being sen­tenced to death. Yet the promise of Furman has not been ful­filled: inno­cent per­sons are still being sen­tenced to death, and the chances are high that inno­cent per­sons have been or will be executed.

Read More