Publications & Testimony

Testimony and Statements on the Death Penalty

FROM DPIC

For tes­ti­mo­ny by for­mer Executive Director Robert Dunham and for­mer Executive Director Richard C. Dieter, please vis­it our page DPIC Testimony.
 

FROM RELIGIOUS LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS

FROM THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY 

FROM ADVOCACY GROUPS

FROM JUDGES, LEGISLATORS, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS

FROM MURDER VICTIMSFAMILY MEMBERS

Latest


Mar 20, 2026

12:01 The Death Penalty in Context: Elizabeth Vartkessian on Mitigation and The Deserving”

In the March 2026 episode of 12:01: The Death Penalty in Context, DPI Managing Director Anne Holsinger speaks with Elizabeth Vartkessian (pic­tured), the exec­u­tive direc­tor of Advancing Real Change (ARC), a nation­al non-prof­it that works to pro­vide mit­i­ga­tion inves­ti­ga­tion ser­vices and train­ing that ensure the full life his­to­ries of indi­vid­u­als fac­ing extreme sen­tences are pre­sent­ed to judges and juries. Ms. Vartkessian is a mit­i­ga­tion spe­cial­ist who has spent…

Read More

Mar 18, 2026

Ohio Court Formally Vindicates” Death Row Exoneree 41 Years After Conviction, Opening the Door for Potentially 1 Million Dollars in Wrongful Conviction Compensation

On March 5, 2026, Hamilton County Common Pleas Judge Christopher McDowell​“for­mal­ly vin­di­cat­ed” death-sen­­tenced exoneree Derrick Jamison, allow­ing him to seek mon­e­tary com­pen­sa­tion from the state for his wrong­ful incar­cer­a­tion 21 years after pros­e­cu­tors dropped charges. Mr. Jamison, who was sched­uled for exe­cu­tion six times while impris­oned, filed a law­suit seek­ing a for­mal dec­la­ra­tion of wrong­ful impris­on­ment in 2024. With this for­mal dec­la­ra­tion, he can…

Read More

Mar 17, 2026

U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Hear State’s Appeal in Michael Sockwell’s Case, Clearing Path for New Trial

On March 2, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review Alabama’s appeal of a rul­ing by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit that reversed and remand­ed Michael Sockwell’s case on the grounds that the tri­al pros­e­cu­tor vio­lat­ed his con­sti­tu­tion­al rights by inten­tion­al­ly remov­ing Black jurors. The Court’s denial of review clears a path for Mr. Sockwell to receive a new tri­al, some 36 years after a judge first sen­tenced him to death. A November 2025 federal…

Read More

Mar 12, 2026

Texas Death Row Prisoner Andre Thomas Too Mentally Ill to Attend His Own Competency Hearing, Doctor Warns

A March 9, 2026, com­pe­ten­cy hear­ing for Andre Thomas, a death-sen­­tenced pris­on­er in Texas, has been post­poned to an unspec­i­fied date because of con­cerns that Mr. Thomas is too men­tal­ly ill to be trans­port­ed to his com­pe­ten­cy hear­ing and he could not be re-exam­­ined by the State’s expert. Mr. Thomas was sched­uled to be exe­cut­ed in April 2023; how­ev­er, his exe­cu­tion date was with­drawn in March 2023, cit­ing con­cerns with his severe men­tal ill­ness (SMI) and…

Read More

Mar 05, 2026

Media Coalition Presses for Access to Indiana Executions

On February 18, 2026, a three-judge pan­el of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard oral argu­ments in a case seek­ing to open exe­cu­tions in Indiana to press wit­ness­es. The First Amendment chal­lenge to Indiana’s absolute ban was ini­ti­at­ed a year ago by a broad coali­tion of media out­lets seek­ing, at that time, to wit­ness the exe­cu­tion of Benjamin Ritchie. The coali­tion was unsuc­cess­ful in that endeav­or; Mr. Ritchie’s May 20, 2025, exe­cu­tion would be later…

Read More

Mar 04, 2026

What to Know: Deterrence and the Death Penalty

DPI’s​“What to Know” series exam­ines cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment from mul­ti­ple angles, one top­ic at a time. Each install­ment pro­vides essen­tial facts and data on spe­cif­ic aspects of the death penal­ty. Why it mat­ters: Deterrence is among the most com­mon­ly cit­ed jus­ti­fi­ca­tions for the death penal­ty, yet decades of research have failed to pro­duce cred­i­ble evi­dence that use of the death penal­ty has an impact on homi­cide rates. ### Key Facts: — 88% of the nation’s…

Read More

Mar 03, 2026

Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor Calls Secrecy Around Florida’s Recent Spate of Executions Troubling”

By con­tin­u­ing to shroud its exe­cu­tions in secre­cy, Florida under­mines both the integri­ty of its own exe­cu­tion process and, poten­tial­ly, this Court’s abil­i­ty to ensure the State’s com­pli­ance with its con­sti­tu­tion­al oblig­a­tions.” —Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor in a February 24, 2026 state­ment accom­pa­ny­ing the denial of cer­tio­rari in the case of Melvin Trotter. Melvin Trotter, Ronnie Heath, and Frank Walls — the most recent of the twenty-one…

Read More

Mar 02, 2026

Alabama Governor Commutes Charles Burton’s Death Sentence After Calls from Broad Coalition of Supporters

UPDATE: On March 10, 2026, two days ahead of his sched­uled exe­cu­tion, Governor Kay Ivey grant­ed clemen­cy for Charles​“Sonny” Burton, com­mut­ing his death sen­tence to a sen­tence of life with­out parole. In a state­ment, Gov. Ivey said,​“I can­not pro­ceed in good con­science with the exe­cu­tion of Mr. Burton under such dis­parate cir­cum­stances. I believe it would be unjust for one par­tic­i­pant in this crime to be exe­cut­ed while the par­tic­i­pant who pulled the trigger…

Read More

Feb 26, 2026

12:01 The Death Penalty In Context: DPI’s Taylor Bonner and U.S. Campaign to Abolish the Death Penalty’s Furonda Brasfield on the Racial History of the Death Penalty

In the February 2026 episode of DPI’s pod­cast, 12:01: The Death Penalty in Context, Furonda Brasfield (pic­tured, left) and Taylor Bonner (pic­tured, below) speak with DPI Managing Director Anne Holsinger about the racial his­to­ry of the death penal­ty and how cur­rent data and nar­ra­tives about racial jus­tice play a role in advo­ca­cy on the death penal­ty. As the Death Penalty Information Center’s Racial Justice Storyteller, Ms. Bonner blends data and his­to­ry to tell the story of…

Read More

Feb 25, 2026

Black History: Forty Years After Supreme Court Upheld Death Qualification” of Juries, Data Consistently Shows Disproportionate Racial Exclusion

The Constitution man­dates that juries be drawn from a​“fair cross-sec­­tion” of the com­mu­ni­ty. Yet pub­lic opin­ion polls show that a sub­stan­tial por­tion of the com­mu­ni­ty oppos­es the death penal­ty. How, then, can the gov­ern­ment seat a jury that will fair­ly decide whether to impose the death penal­ty and pro­tect a defendant’s con­sti­tu­tion­al jury rights? The legal system’s long­stand­ing answer to this ques­tion is a pro­ce­dure called​“death qual­i­fi­ca­tion,” which…

Read More