Reports

Below are reports released by the Death Penalty Information Center since its inception, covering subjects such as race, innocence, politicization, costs of the death penalty, and more. When opening a report, please allow the report page to load fully before selecting links to sections or footnotes.

Most of these reports are also available in printed form from DPIC.  For a copy of one of these reports, e-mail DPIC.  For bulk orders, please download our Resource Order Form.

See also DPIC Year End Reports.

 

The 2% Death Penalty: How a Minority of Counties Produce Most Death Cases at Enormous Costs to All

(Released October 1, 2013)

Contrary to the assumption that the death penalty is widely practiced across the country, it is actually the domain of a small percentage of U.S. counties in a handful of states. The burdens created by this narrow but aggressive use, however, are shifted to the majority of counties that almost never use it.

The disparate and highly clustered use of the death penalty raises serious questions of unequal and arbitrary application of the law. It also forces the jurisdictions that have resisted the death penalty for decades to pay for a costly legal process that is often marred with injustice.

Only 2% of the counties in the U.S. have been responsible for the majority of cases leading to executions since 1976. Likewise, only 2% of the counties are responsible for the majority of today’s death row population and recent death sentences. To put it another way, all of the state executions since the death penalty was reinstated stem from cases in just 15% of the counties in the U.S. All of the 3,125 inmates on death row as of January 1, 2013 came from just 20% of the counties.

Each decision to seek the death penalty is made by a single county district attorney, who is answerable only to the voters of that county. Nevertheless, all state taxpayers will have to bear the substantial financial costs of each death penalty case, and some of the costs will even be borne on a national level.

 


Struck by Lightning: The Continuing Arbitrariness of the Death Penalty Thirty-Five Years After Its Reinstatement in 1976

(released June 22, 2011)

From the Executive Summary:

After three and a half decades of experience under these revised statutes, the randomness of the system continues. Many of the country's constitutional experts and prominent legal organizations have concluded that effective reform is impossible and the practice should be halted. In polls, jury verdicts and state legislative action, there is evidence of the American people's growing frustration with the death penalty. A majority of the nine Justices who served on the Supreme Court in 1976 when the death penalty was approved eventually concluded the experiment had failed.

The report shows that despite the changes to sentencing schemes approved by the U.S. Supreme Court on July 2, 1976, race, geography, money and other factors continue to make the implementation of the death penalty arbitrary and unfair.

Read DPIC's press release.

Read former U.S. Attorney Thomas Sullivan's Op-Ed citing the report.

 


Smart on Crime: Reconsidering the Death Penalty in a Time of Economic Crisis

(released October 20, 2009)

From the Executive Summary:

The death penalty in the U.S. is an enormously expensive and wasteful program with no clear benefits. All of the studies on the cost of capital punishment conclude it is much more expensive than a system with life sentences as the maximum penalty. In a time of painful budget cutbacks, states are pouring money into a system that results in a declining number of death sentences and executions that are almost exclusively carried out in just one area of the country. As many states face further deficits, it is an appropriate time to consider whether maintaining the costly death penalty system is being smart on crime.

The nation’s police chiefs rank the death penalty last in their priorities for effective crime reduction. The officers do not believe the death penalty acts as a deterrent to murder, and they rate it as one of most inefficient uses of taxpayer dollars in fighting crime. Criminologists concur that the death penalty does not effectively reduce the number of murders.

A Crisis of Confidence: Americans' Doubts About the Death Penalty.
(released June 9, 2007)
Media Coverage Report

From the Introduction:

According to a national public opinion poll conducted in 2007, the public is losing confidence in the death penalty.  People are deeply concerned about the risk of executing the innocent, about the fairness of the process, and about the inability of capital punishment to accomplish its basic purposes.  Most Americans believe that innocent people have already been executed, that the death penalty is not a deterrent to crime, and that a moratorium should be placed on all executions.

Blind Justice: Juries Deciding Life and Death With Only Half the Truth

(released October 18, 2005)

From the Executive Summary:

Blind Justice, the most recent report to be released by the Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC), is the first to focus on the problems of the death penalty from the perspective of jurors. While jurors have always occupied an esteemed position in the broader criminal justice system in the United States, in capital cases the responsibility of jurors is even more critical as they decide whether defendants should live or die. Even with this unique authority in capital cases, they are treated less than respectfully. Frequently, they are kept in the dark regarding key information about the case and are often barred from serving based on their beliefs or their race.

Innocence and the Crisis in the American Death Penalty

(released September 17, 2004)

From the Executive Summary:

This report catalogs the emergence of innocence as the most important issue in the long-simmering death penalty debate. The sheer number of cases and the pervasive awareness of this trend in the public’s consciousness have changed the way capital punishment is perceived around the country. The steady evolution of this issue since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976 has been accelerated in recent years by the development of DNA technology, the new gold standard of forensic investigation. This science, along with a vigorous re-investigation of many cases, has led to the discovery of a growing number of tragic mistakes and freed inmates.

International Perspectives on the Death Penalty:

A Costly Isolation for the U.S.
(released October 12, 1999)

From the Executive Summary:

Some of the world's most respected leaders have also called for an end to the death penalty, including Pope John Paul II, Nelson Mandela, and U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, Mary Robinson. But the U.S. ignores these appeals and even the more moderate steps called for by the international human rights community. The U.S. has further distanced itself by expanding capital punishment to broader classes of crimes, and applying it against society's most vulnerable offenders.

The Death Penalty in Black & White:

Who Lives, Who Dies, Who Decides
(released June 4, 1998)
La Peine De Mort en Noir Et Blanc: Qui Vit, Qui Meurt, Qui Decide - translated into French by Debra Mervant

From the Executive Summary:

The results of two new studies which underscore the continuing injustice of racism in the application of the death penalty are being released through this report. The first study documents the infectious presence of racism in the death penalty, and demonstrates that this problem has not slackened with time, nor is it restricted to a single region of the country. The other study identifies one of the potential causes for this continuing crisis: those who are making the critical death penalty decisions in this country are almost exclusively white.

Innocence and the Death Penalty:

The Increasing Danger of Executing the Innocent

(released July 15, 1997)

From the Executive Summary:

The danger that innocent people will be executed because of errors in the criminal justice system is getting worse. A total of 69 people have been released from death row since 1973 after evidence of their innocence emerged. Twenty-one condemned inmates have been released since 1993, including seven from the state of Illinois alone. Many of these cases were discovered not because of the normal appeals process, but rather as a result of new scientific techniques, investigations by journalists, and the dedicated work of expert attorneys, not available to the typical death row inmate.

Killing for Votes:

The Dangers of Politicizing the Death Penalty Process
(released October 18, 1996)

From the Introduction:

The infusion of the death penalty into political races is reaching new extremes and distorting the criminal justice system. Although the use of death sentences to gain political leverage is certainly not new, the demagoguery aimed at escalating executions has become more pervasive. Not only are candidates for legislative office campaigning loudly on the death penalty, even judges and local prosecutors are citing the numbers of people they have sent to death row in their campaigns for office. This political promotion of capital punishment by those responsible for interpreting and implementing the law interferes with the right to a fair hearing and increases the likelihood that innocent defendants will be executed.

Twenty Years of Capital Punishment:

A Re-evaluation
(June 1996)

From the Introuction:

The death penalty's arbitrary quality meant that those with the power to hurl this lightning could be influenced by personal prejudices. There was ample evidence, for example, that juries, judges and prosecutors were more likely to inflict the death penalty on African-Americans, especially if the victim in the underlying crime was white.  The opening created by the arbitrariness of the process resulted in a flood of cases which were all too predictable: the death penalty was used primarily against the poor, minorities, and those unable to secure competent attorneys.

With Justice for Few:

The Growing Crisis in Death Penalty Representation
(1995)

From the Executive Summary:

As executions reach record numbers in the U.S., the system of representation for those facing the death penalty is in a state of crisis. Far from the legal "dream team" assembled in the O.J. Simpson case, capital defendants are given attorneys who fail to investigate, who fall asleep during trial or come into court drunk, attorneys barely out of law school, or attorneys who say nothing when their client's life is on the line. Too many states encourage this malpractice by offering totally inadequate pay and resources for death penalty defense. States allow elected judges to pick attorneys not on the basis of experience or merit but because they will cause the least "trouble" in trying the case.

On the Front Line:

Law Enforcement Views on the Death Penalty
(1995)

From the Introduction:

A new national survey of police chiefs from around the country discredits the repeated assertion that the death penalty is an important law enforcement tool. While politicians have extolled the importance of capital punishment in fighting crime, they have failed to assess the actual priorities of those in law enforcement and have saddled the taxpayers with an enormously costly death penalty at the expense of more effective crime fighting strategies.

The Future of the Death Penalty in the U.S.:

A Texas-Sized Crisis
(1994)

From the Executive Summary:

Texas is the nation's foremost executioner. It has been responsible for a third of the executions in the country and has carried out two and a half times as many death sentences as the next leading state. Death warrants are being signed at an unmanageable pace, yet the Texas death row is bulging with unprecedented numbers of inmates. But this accelerated form of justice comes at a price. The rest of the country should heed the warning of the Texas experience before it embarks on a wholesale expansion of the death penalty.

Racial Disparities:

In Federal Death Penalty Prosecutions 1988-1994
(1994)

From the Executive Summary:

Racial minorities are being prosecuted under federal death penalty law far beyond their proportion in the general population or the population of criminal offenders. Analysis of prosecutions under the federal death penalty provisions of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 reveals that 89% of the defendants selected for capital prosecution have been either African-American or Mexican-American. Moreover, the number of prosecutions under this Act has been increasing over the past two years with no decline in the racial disparities. All ten of the recently approved federal capital prosecutions have been against black defendants. This pattern of inequality adds to the mounting evidence that race continues to play an unacceptable part in the application of capital punishment in America today. It confirms Justice Blackmun's recent conclusion that "the death penalty experiment has failed."

Innocence and the Death Penalty:

Assessing the Danger of Mistaken Executions
(1993)

From the Introduction:

In 1972, when the Supreme Court ruled in Furman v. Georgia that the death penalty as then applied was arbitrary and capricious and therefore unconstitutional, a mjority of the Justices expected that the adoption of narrowly crafted sentencing procedures would protect against innocent persons being sentenced to death. Yet the promise of Furman has not been fulfilled: innocent persons are still being sentenced to death, and the chances are high that innocent persons have been or will be executed.

Sentencing for Life:

Americans Embrace Alternatives to the Death Penalty
(1993)

From the Introduction:

Contrary to the conventional wisdom that Americans wholeheartedly support the death penalty, the latest national opinion poll released in conjunction with this report shows that more people in this country would prefer alternative sentences that guarantee both protection and punishment over the death penalty. Death penalty support becomes a minority opinion when the public is presented with a variety of alternative sentences. Most Americans, however, are unaware that the length of imprisonment embodied in these alternatives is now the norm almost everywhere in the country.
 

Millions Misspent:

What Politicians Don't Say About the High Costs of the Death Penalty
(1992, updated with additional information 1994)

From the Executive Summary:

Across the country, police are being laid off, prisoners are being released early, the courts are clogged, and crime continues to rise. The economic recession has caused cutbacks in the backbone of the criminal justice system. In Florida, the budget crisis resulted in the early release of 3,000 prisoners. In Texas, prisoners are serving only 20% of their time and rearrests are common. Georgia is laying off 900 correctional personnel and New Jersey has had to dismiss 500 police officers. Yet these same states, and many others like them, are pouring millions of dollars into the death penalty with no resultant reduction in crime.

Killing Justice:

Government Misconduct and the Death Penalty
(1992)

From the Overview:

Misconduct by the government in the pursuit of a death sentence can take many forms. But whether it involves the use of threats and intimidation to obtain a "confession," the use of jailhouse informants who secretly enter into deals with the prosecution for their testimony, or the government's unrevealed promise of leniency for one co-defendant in exchange for his or her testimony against another, the resulting death sentence is fundamentally unfair, and cannot be tolerated in a society which honors the principle that no person is above the law.

Justice on the Cheap:

The Philadelphia Story
(1992)

From the Introduction:

"Them without the capital get the punishment" is a well-worn phrase among those who have studied the unequal application of the death penalty in America. Poor people facing society's ultimate penalty must rely on public funds to ensure they are competently represented, as the Constitution guarantees. Yet, in more and more jurisdictions, public services of all kinds are being slashed for lack of adequate funding. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, is one such jurisdiction--a dramatic and graphic example of a nationwide problem.

Chattahoochee Judicial District - The Buckle of the Death Belt:

The Death Penalty in Microcosm
(1991)

From the Summary:

Nearly 20 years after the Supreme Court held the death penalty unconstitutional--largely because of racial discrimination--the death penalty in America continues to reflect the worst aspects of our judicial system: racism, unequal treatment of the poor, a shamefully inadequate legal defense system and abuse of discretion by ambitious prosecutors and other politicians seeking higher office.  The Chattahoochee Judicial District in Georgia is a microcosm of this national disgrace.

DPIC 2013 Year End Report

DPIC 2012 Year End Report

DPIC 2011 Year End Report

DPIC 2010 Year End Report

DPIC 2009 Year End Report

DPIC 2008 Year End Report

DPIC 2007 Year End Report

DPIC 2006 Year End Report

DPIC 2005 Year End Report

DPIC 2004 Year End Report

DPIC 2003 Year End Report

DPIC 2002 Year End Report

DPIC 2001 Year End Report

DPIC 2000 Year End Report

DPIC 1999 Year End Report

DPIC 1998 Year End Report

DPIC 1997 Year End Report

DPIC 1996 Year End Report

DPIC 1995 Year End Report